IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] SSH Protocol Extensions

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Wed, 12 August 2015 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC361A8ADB for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VjqgptNKhD_5 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [38.117.134.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 558721A8A9D for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 6C423284B55; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:22:14 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:22:14 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: saag@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150812162214.GS9139@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <CAPofZaFwCdNKzM42HJMJzLsx+VSVt07Jp+FHA7rV1g7+X7RNNQ@mail.gmail.com> <55CB2D0F.8000606@restena.lu> <CAPofZaHz6rUE54SOX-sS3VDqtKbdsWifX1iWWqKhySR7rXqdmw@mail.gmail.com> <12386.1439391436@sandelman.ca> <20150812155016.GA24354@localhost> <CAPofZaFxTBJ+fz+n-N09Au_yx_De3pR_JfTdhsBxycW3MnvB8Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPofZaFxTBJ+fz+n-N09Au_yx_De3pR_JfTdhsBxycW3MnvB8Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/CxVS0xchqINBQ4FrD37ZzpP2D2w>
Subject: Re: [saag] SSH Protocol Extensions
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: saag@ietf.org
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:22:16 -0000

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 05:13:02PM +0100, Phil Lello wrote:

> Admittedly, I'm currently put off by
> what appears to be a steep learning curve once GSS, RADIUS, et al. come
> into the mix, but with my 'lazy coder' hat on, it doesn't seem unreasonable
> that other potential implementers will feel the same.

Is this confusing implementation with deployment?

Once the platform's GSSAPI library supports ABFAB, it becomes a
question of deployment, not implementation.

-- 
	Viktor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email