[saag] SACM report
Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org> Wed, 20 November 2019 23:56 UTC
Return-Path: <inacio@cert.org>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437601208AD for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 15:56:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IuBDtuFx-ZnV for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 15:56:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BF3A120884 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 15:56:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id xAKNuIdb016216 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:56:18 -0500
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu xAKNuIdb016216
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1574294178; bh=SfdoaI1yEIQSCOxaz7r6Ez86zuAQ0vT/KaCPQevB1i4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=dcU2A4Bbzsny7C2pBn9j5yHsFdbUxxRBgMdSXFWm65BCZaKqGe1IgTvrhraO9l+Qg WgJh9zE46lYtf4tl7yZI/gupJadXydB9+yo4rcgxLkidxiGn4IJk4NhM4FJ+IMXRRW vAklQjI0/tLxZaGhWg5co9CuWzsTmJAJaXeEQFAY=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id xAKNuDpj003704 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:56:14 -0500
Received: from MARCHAND.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.251]) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:56:13 -0500
From: Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org>
To: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: SACM report
Thread-Index: AQHVn/4WX2iGe/lfgUGpJN8dUSAvpQ==
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:56:13 +0000
Message-ID: <F4C659E9-0788-4936-B51A-5F031BA990D7@cert.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.201.19]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <BD0B6A33EBDC5A4AA2B5A98F332253E3@sei.cmu.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/YELYAWeTL3ZbWapbMcpG0H3kSDM>
Subject: [saag] SACM report
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:56:21 -0000
SACM met first thing on Tuesday morning. The WGLC is complete and the WG will progress ROLIE software descriptor (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-rolie-softwaredescriptor/) to the IESG. The Endpoint Posture Collection Profile (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-epcp/) completed one round of WGLC, but requires another set of reviews based on the number of edits from the WGLC. Reviewers are identified and the WG expects to progress the document before IETF-107. Coswid (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/) has completed multiple WGLC’s but a late added comment about signing the inventory statements needs to be resolved before the document progresses to IESG. The WG also discussed and made progress on the architecture (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-arch/) draft and its links and relationships to an info model draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-inacio-sacm-infomodel/) and the terminology draft. Chris Inacio
- [saag] SACM report Chris Inacio