Re: [sacm] REMINDER: WGLC for draft-ietf-sacm-ecp

Hi *,

sorry for being late. I did an extensive review and am in favor of 
moving this work forward. There are several tiny nits that are already 
in resolution. But I would like to provide the following distillate of 
which I think it is general structural issue:

1.) The use of terms seems to be under a surprising paradigm shift after 
section 3.
"Agent", "Evaluator", etc. - the terms used until the end of section 3 
seem to be in stark disconnected with the text starting with section 4.

2.) It is either ECP or EPCP :)

Viele Grüße,

Henk

p.s. my apologies for being late, I actually though I submitted this on 
Fri already

On 7/13/19 7:48 PM, Karen O'Donoghue wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> One week left on this last call…
> 
> Thanks in advance for your review and comments!
> Karen
> 
> 
>> On Jun 27, 2019, at 4:34 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org 
>> <mailto:odonoghue@isoc.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> As discussed at our virtual interim on Tuesday, this begins a three 
>> week working group last call for:
>> Endpoint Posture Collection Profile
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-ecp/
>>
>> Please reply to this email thread with an indication that you have 
>> read the document, any comments you may have, and your assessment of 
>> whether or not it is ready to proceed to publication.
>>
>> DEADLINE: Please reply by Friday 19 July 2019.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Karen and Chris
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sacm mailing list
>> sacm@ietf.org <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
> 