[scale] No BoF in London, but please continue the discussion

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Sun, 12 January 2014 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: scale@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scale@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6071ADFB5 for <scale@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 10:13:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W6Gi6UT4f3g4 for <scale@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 10:13:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alt-proxy16.mail.unifiedlayer.com (alt-proxy16.mail.unifiedlayer.com [70.40.197.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0683C1ADF7D for <scale@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 10:13:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 25833 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jan 2014 18:13:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2014 18:13:30 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=9ga7b4KHym2DRnwN7WD8GTUSxnhLtlnD0DXwLeQ28xM=; b=hOxk5kko+FTwY2SldM21Z6tjIOpjUr2W+sgt8CYKqwssif7BuKr5e0dHYCd26WQm2PMoWy2USreb7Rr0RvkkFsYq9j5HrbZcBTZgTasDQxEGYuIov0WMaLPRJ8OPhhyi;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:43543 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1W2PXL-0006MF-91; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:13:27 -0700
Message-ID: <52D2DB44.4020706@labn.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:13:24 -0500
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: scale@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Loa Anderson <loa@pi.nu>
Subject: [scale] No BoF in London, but please continue the discussion
X-BeenThere: scale@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS VPN Scaling <scale.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scale>, <mailto:scale-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scale/>
List-Post: <mailto:scale@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scale-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scale>, <mailto:scale-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 18:13:46 -0000

All,
	Adrian, Loa and I have agreed the we haven't had the level of
discussion/interest to justify a BoF in London.  That said, this list
will remain open (for now) and we encourage those of you who are
interested in this topic to meet in London in bars and other convivial
venues to discuss the topic. (and identify the specific topics and
issues that may justify a future BoF.)

For those interested in the topic, I suggest taking a look at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gs-vpn-scaling and the slides sent by
Loa http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scale/current/msg00003.html as
a starting point.

Lou (+ Loa & Adrian)