[scap_interest] Any comments on the drafts that were posted?
<Kent_Landfield@McAfee.com> Fri, 22 October 2010 17:04 UTC
Return-Path: <Kent_Landfield@McAfee.com>
X-Original-To: scap_interest@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scap_interest@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623FE3A6938 for <scap_interest@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.614
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.614 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.984, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iEbeGu6uCWYe for <scap_interest@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dalsmrelay2.nai.com (dalsmrelay2.nai.com [205.227.136.216]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447AA3A6844 for <scap_interest@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown [10.64.5.52]) by dalsmrelay2.nai.com with smtp (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) id 1c84_f070_a31d7b24_ddfe_11df_b61f_00219b929abd; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:05:56 +0000
Received: from AMERDALEXMB1.corp.nai.org ([fe80::b534:4a0d:1289:2d2d]) by DALEXHT2.corp.nai.org ([::1]) with mapi; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:04:29 -0500
From: Kent_Landfield@McAfee.com
To: scap_interest@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:04:27 -0500
Thread-Topic: Any comments on the drafts that were posted?
Thread-Index: ActyCy86fJqU+Bm+TlG6fF6p+H1eTQ==
Message-ID: <B277F0D458571E469F8E7AD2DD8A210233DDB0E6C9@AMERDALEXMB1.corp.nai.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B277F0D458571E469F8E7AD2DD8A210233DDB0E6C9AMERDALEXMB1c_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [scap_interest] Any comments on the drafts that were posted?
X-BeenThere: scap_interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion List for IETFers interested in the Security Content Automation Protocol \(SCAP\)." <scap_interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scap_interest>, <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scap_interest>
List-Post: <mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scap_interest>, <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:04:22 -0000
All, The drafts are out and available. I hope you have had some time to read through them. If not, please do. We really need your input to make them right. I KNOW they are not perfect so send your comments to the list. The two document are located at: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-landfield-scap-naming-00.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-waltermire-scap-xccdf-00.txt If you have read them and have no issues with them, I'd like the list to hear that too. ;-) Thanks. -- Kent Landfield Director, Content Strategy, Architecture and Standards McAfee, Inc. +1 972.963.7096 Direct +1 817.637.8026 Mobile kent_landfield@mcafee.com<mailto:kent_landfield@mcafee.com>
- [scap_interest] Any comments on the drafts that w… Kent_Landfield