IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [scim] Unique Attributes

Gayan Gunawardana <gayan@wso2.com> Tue, 07 February 2017 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <gayan@wso2.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531D512956D for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:51:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=wso2.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8qNhblYhilG0 for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:51:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FE17129D6C for <scim@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:51:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id v77so162960117wmv.0 for <scim@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:51:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wso2.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DfUxj37yuLv7Wzfz/Wumul7UfS/VLN7piGiCs5q36oQ=; b=MdRmzfJeZ+mmdOWPkvH0mcyUkzXARluxTuWpJKO3bLJfEF3J6CEVlz6CWQsgbIqtFo pPogpnhdiByhcvpEVAtvAmMPHP2nPpFv25Qs2EcJ/5AbCzKWCol2FQii5gsImth7XMYG EcoGQoW+PNxZcVDhiCSVLQxn98B4jMDxu4rmg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DfUxj37yuLv7Wzfz/Wumul7UfS/VLN7piGiCs5q36oQ=; b=kepUSrXgBRKibJJaJeExyVNuA5o1JGNJvMQxxIHQ6x2UasfvdwEVBbhiwIjoaCHfFO EdsshrJuSEsN61Wiv8k2KuphgAOGbCJt5irW90JqsQ7QmssOn5k0Va3L0sD+XcFD7q1/ Tf0omYXG5HaqLIfFl9aklqmZtIcKVxUAzyN2sQ1Esxwp0rJMkXixvxaafm4eELyywOPJ O+Tns8y9T+S57BseqAy2RdbmaeiV4GpkVAIkX0nFB4GxU018s3YjFsvSs6zXX1SfP8FI U0CIEyn4WyHjfwLipj+vKhTsh/iKk1Ub9jUKJBW7rvcXwIHL6igP6PmeSYMSby1ipJiA iblg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIOWqosC6DcUjIOHvM/RUe4CFIq28WluuCXSr9GJ3QdBG17megECSZlzUSpTpt6sOSDSytwZ9+q9bU9mrax
X-Received: by 10.223.131.34 with SMTP id 31mr18373478wrd.119.1486486260694; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:51:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.134.169 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:51:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <82A7E941-516E-4556-A601-C599D3D53D3C@oracle.com>
References: <CALzgRACxDfdcP-Vm6aKeUH1ihNiwnbf4E7hBN3V1VpJdGvTYew@mail.gmail.com> <82A7E941-516E-4556-A601-C599D3D53D3C@oracle.com>
From: Gayan Gunawardana <gayan@wso2.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 22:21:00 +0530
Message-ID: <CALzgRAC9RzX6BLjEL6gJuL-A4A_5893QBoWzTgPbshrnLJVR_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Phil Hunt (IDM)" <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0d106e88579e0547f38dfc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/I4vU-xIPWogujtlKvpEvr8S_pYc>
Cc: scim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [scim] Unique Attributes
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scim/>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:51:07 -0000

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Phil Hunt (IDM) <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
wrote:

> Sorry I missed this one earlier.
>
> IMO The schema in the spec sets the default expectations and what clients
> will typically expect.
>
> But yes you can change uniqueness-the uniqueness for each attribute should
> be discoverable in your schemas endpoint.
>
Yes this is more logical. Thanks Phil.

>
> Phil
>
> On Feb 4, 2017, at 9:12 PM, Gayan Gunawardana <gayan@wso2.com> wrote:
>
> According to [1] userName seems to be an unique attribute where duplicate
> resources identified with userName. Similarly
>
> Is Group "displayName" an unique attribute ?
>
> If answer is no, Does implementation have flexibility to decide uniqueness
> ?
>
> [1]https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7644#section-3.3
>
> Thanks,
> Gayan
>
> --
> Gayan Gunawardana
> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
> Email: gayan@wso2.com
> Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933
>
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>
>


-- 
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: gayan@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email