[secdir] [new-work] WG Review: IPv6 Maintenance (6man)
The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> Fri, 11 October 2013 16:38 UTC
Return-Path: <new-work-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203E721E8203; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1381509530; bh=KqejQKBeZBrwofa8DigooPKjJfiN6cA+O9o53IGA2fU=; h=MIME-Version:From:To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=NLEds9B+/ywmC1k5mylah4ABghs69jq4ic9gw/xv4nnseCZbP7icoRrv1c+q4hgQo KIzwx4tEK3kkiEawx4t3Lu0Zmp9GYfFXaEEsUHVrycoklQM7DTOFQ32i4sqNDvS+3t 2lnu1hHnqMJAPYKOe0iLdbJi7Rv12M2RoQsGjJOU=
X-Original-To: new-work@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: new-work@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9AF21E8202; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FJFV4wfmFZSZ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D2A21E814A; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
To: new-work@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.80.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20131011163836.4914.71265.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:38:36 -0700
X-BeenThere: new-work@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: new-work-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: new-work-bounces@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:39:36 -0700
Subject: [secdir] [new-work] WG Review: IPv6 Maintenance (6man)
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
Reply-To: iesg@ietf.org
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:38:50 -0000
The IPv6 Maintenance (6man) working group in the Internet Area of the IETF is undergoing rechartering. The IESG has not made any determination yet. The following draft charter was submitted, and is provided for informational purposes only. Please send your comments to the IESG mailing list (iesg at ietf.org) by 2013-10-21. IPv6 Maintenance (6man) ------------------------------------------------ Current Status: Active WG Chairs: Robert Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Assigned Area Director: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Mailing list Address: ipv6@ietf.org To Subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6 Charter: The 6man working group is responsible for the maintenance, upkeep, and advancement of the IPv6 protocol specifications and addressing architecture. It is not chartered to develop major changes or additions to the IPv6 specifications. The working group will address protocol limitations/issues discovered during deployment and operation. It will also serve as a venue for discussing the proper location for working on IPv6-related issues within the IETF. 6man is the design authority for extensions and modifications to the IPv6 protocol. The working group may at its discretion, review any document extending or modifying the protocol, carried out in another working group, and may determine that 6man working group consensus is needed before any of those documents can progress for publication. Milestones: Done - Submit RH0 Deprecation specification to IESG as a Proposed Standard Done - Submit PPP Compression Negotiation specification to IESG as a Proposed Standard Done - Determine way forward for ULA-C specification Nov 2013 - Resolve open issues with "U/G" bits in Interface Identifiers Mar 2014 - Develop approach for IPv6 Fragmentation Mar 2014 - Develop approaches for IPv6 Extension Headers (Hop-by-Hop and Destination) Jul 2014 - Advance IPv6 core specifications to Internet standard _______________________________________________ new-work mailing list new-work@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/new-work