Re: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11
"Jiankang Yao" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> Sun, 13 October 2019 13:58 UTC
Return-Path: <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9F6120033; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 06:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RKFAnzuYM6Bs; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 06:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7EE12000F; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 06:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ajax-webmail-ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 21:58:40 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
X-Originating-IP: [159.226.7.2]
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 21:58:40 +0800
X-CM-HeaderCharset: UTF-8
From: Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version XT3.0.8 dev build 20190610(cb3344cf) Copyright (c) 2002-2019 www.mailtech.cn cnnic
In-Reply-To: <157071977760.20403.2267644082355726284@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <157071977760.20403.2267644082355726284@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-SendMailWithSms: false
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <25e400f9.1403.16dc569fbf8.Coremail.yaojk@cnnic.cn>
X-Coremail-Locale: zh_CN
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0BpGL2QLaNdGIqXBA--.6368W
X-CM-SenderInfo: x1dryyw6fq0xffof0/1tbiAQACDSVCN6BTwgABsu
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Ur529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7IcSsGvfJ3iIAIbVAYjsxI4VWxJw CS07vEb4IE77IF4wCS07vE1I0E4x80FVAKz4kxMIAIbVAFxVCaYxvI4VCIwcAKzIAtYxBI daVFxhVjvjDU=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Mnp-yWlxyaKtvDQ4SMaG4AMOTR4>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:58:51 -0000
> -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: "Russ Housley via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> > 发送时间: 2019-10-10 23:02:57 (星期四) > 收件人: secdir@ietf.org > 抄送: draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org > 主题: Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11 > > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review result: Has Issues > > I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's ongoing > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These > comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Security Area > Directors. Document authors, document editors, and WG chairs should > treat these comments just like any other IETF Last Call comments. > > Document: draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11 > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review Date: 2019-10-10 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-03-15 > IESG Telechat date: 2019-10-17 > Dear Russ Housley. Thanks a lot for your kind review. > Summary: Has Issues > > > Major Concerns: > > The Abstract ans Section 1 say: "This is a non-standard proprietary > extension." I understand that this is not a standards track document, so > the "non-standard" part makes sense. yes, the WG decided that this document is informational. > However, what is the point of > publishing a "proprietary" extension as an RFC. I would hope that > interoperable implementations is the goal of publication. > If the registry follows this document, both registry and its all registrars should follow this document. Yes, interoperable implementation is very important. > In Section 1, the use of "policy-wise" is unclear. Is this registration > policy or something else? > How about Policy-wise bundling ---> Bundling based on policy > > Minor Concerns: > > None. > > > Nits: > > Section 1: s/label(LABEL)/label (LABEL)/ > - s/(V-tld);/(V-tld)./ > will update it. Thanks a lot. Jiankang Yao > In addition, there are several places in the upper left corner of the > title page: > Internet Engineering Task Force > >
- [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-reg… Russ Housley via Datatracker
- Re: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf… Jiankang Yao
- Re: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf… Barry Leiba
- Re: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf… Barry Leiba
- Re: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf… John C Klensin
- Re: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf… John C Klensin