Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-13.txt

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> Tue, 21 December 2010 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E633A68AE; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:23:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.435
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.164, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N3tRv6OjrRNx; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:23:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13593A6894; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:23:20 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAE9HEE2tJV2b/2dsb2JhbACkCHOkRZt+hUkEhGWGHYMY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,208,1291593600"; d="scan'208";a="195300820"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2010 14:25:16 +0000
Received: from [161.44.174.114] (dhcp-161-44-174-114.cisco.com [161.44.174.114]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBLEPFrT026054; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:25:15 GMT
Message-ID: <4D10B8CB.8070902@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:25:15 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer.all@tools.ietf.org
References: <20101221090126.GB32839@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20101221090126.GB32839@elstar.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:14:13 -0800
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-13.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:23:21 -0000

Juergen,

On 12/21/2010 4:01 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
> security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
> these comments just like any other last call comments.
>
> I reviewed draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-10 back in Feburary 2009
> and my comments do not seem to have caused changes to the document as
> far as I read the diffs. My original comments can be found here:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg00460.html

I'm sorry - I didn't realize these had not been picked up.
(This document has had a long slog.)

We will have to discuss, and get back to you with some text.

	Thanks,
	Paul