Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label

["Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Paul,

The idnits pre-5378 warning is caused by the "updates" clause.
There is no pre-5378 material in the I-D.

Cheers,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Wouters [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: 08 September 2015 20:16
> To: secdir; [e-mail]; draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-
> [e-mail]
> Subject: secdir review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label
> 
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
> security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
> these comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> The draft is Ready with nits
> 
> This document defines a new Flexi-Grid value for Lambda Switch Capable
> (LSC) Label Switching Routers. The specification of this new label
> references an external (ITU) specification.
> 
> The security considerations of this document properly refers to other
> documents, such as RFC3471, RFC3473 and RFC5920. No new security issues
> are introduced in this document, as it merely defines a new label to use
> which causes no backwards compatibility issues.
> 
> nits:
> 
>   -- The document seems to lack a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but may
>       have content which was first submitted before 10 November 2008.  If you
>       have contacted all the original authors and they are all willing to
grant
>       the BCP78 rights to the IETF Trust, then this is fine, and you can
ignore
>       this comment.  If not, you may need to add the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer.
>       (See the Legal Provisions document at
>       http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info for more information.)
> 
> 
> Paul