[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-22

Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 07 April 2023 04:12 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8371C3AB837; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 21:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.15.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <168084073868.14121.14611153590487253525@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2023 21:12:18 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_R3sr5bZHLwm912lhKPswG-Qg_8>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-22
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2023 04:12:18 -0000

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Has Nits

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last-call comments.

This draft is to reserve .alt as the Special-Use Domain Names. Section 1 says
that the technique is to address problems discussed in RFC8244. After reading
the RFC8244, I learned RFC8244 covers many more problems, not just the .alt
Special-Use Domain Names. Suggest adding the specific section of the RFC8244
for reference.

Question: Are the .local and  .onion part of the Special-use domain names
registered in IANA?

Thank you very much,
Linda Dunbar