[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mib-management-overview-05

David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com> Mon, 12 December 2011 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mcgrew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FDA21F84A5; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:18:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iB5uayelmgQd; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:18:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251CD21F847F; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:18:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=mcgrew@cisco.com; l=658; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1323724700; x=1324934300; h=message-id:from:to:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version:subject:date:cc; bh=bBO8xBfaTTMU9M6aWWqX+bDvxlQkSzxKTH2qccAZMUM=; b=LkYddeuKk7RNlVmSQIRrx2v+cZBWq0aBrnZ9FD7jljwUVFtoj4x30IOf IAzziIFwjma+DSGY8u51M5ENt4Fv9nnDTe3+MUbGGwxSlyQ3EFBBoBJgE 5lfJnR1euALOzBF3iDVFHHtlR11rSlTjFeWtMPdPZ/tweuI6j5FvYnrhK 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvwEAHBu5k6rRDoI/2dsb2JhbABDqweBBYILASUCP4E/NJ5qAZ4xiwpjBIgxjECFS4x9
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,341,1320624000"; d="scan'208";a="20284002"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Dec 2011 21:18:18 +0000
Received: from [10.32.254.210] ([10.32.254.210]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pBCLIHAs015125; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:18:18 GMT
Message-Id: <3426FBC7-B75A-46B9-A341-D6CE0EFFAD28@cisco.com>
From: David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mib-management-overview.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:18:17 -0800
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: "iesg@ietf.org IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mib-management-overview-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:18:20 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's  
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the  
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the  
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat  
these comments just like any other last call comments.
As the draft says: "This document describes the interrelationships  
amongst the different MIB modules relevant to MPLS-TP management and  
as such does not have any security implications in and of itself."    
The draft does give some motivation and overview of SNMP security,  
which is useful.
regards,
David