IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-stox-groupchat-10

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Mon, 02 March 2015 23:00 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917E31A8A79 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 15:00:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0qwP5yIP2z4B for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 15:00:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com (mail-ig0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E0E81A1BFA for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 15:00:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by igal13 with SMTP id l13so21808882iga.5 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:00:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oclt9Ekdhy4eXk6QKoTT1FZCUrkmZJ8fegYN+bN350I=; b=SKWplI71zNJciyIZWBYGyTRli0pLVJ8QRst8U9kncIykIgVkOiU0amFBl+LrLvcIcN E9PFokxBMJT/QSIHrvcqxW+oKr21keKPxc80DG4BI99jQQ30IiTLJlkBvFHrqAdRqur2 dT0jXzEvyS0Hyfyhnx0Hz7vHm9v2u2HElW5hUWpzHhOGuPIk1JzY61VUx++w4HOZSr1v 9eIjPm6jg9/L2Gutc4KsQlHEyMwI7eq6Bkgf2agzPKWraXJe3sxml8NV/kd+U4IcoXTc B41BnruVKU+18FyRjZTQ5o7FmwFdsBVX8HAwsB8/effY780qch5KFNM8RW7A8aqRzaGZ Zb2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmgC5DANnBqCDfbuEgJ9fprsyKd3ExiufZvtNzG26jsZjBVe6FFk8zkHdZbF9Ij4jUVMZdV
X-Received: by 10.107.128.69 with SMTP id b66mr40244864iod.30.1425337236728; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:00:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t41sm8764577ioi.0.2015.03.02.15.00.35 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:00:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54F4EB93.1020907@andyet.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 16:00:35 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>, draft-ietf-stox-groupchat.all@tools.ietf.org, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <54F4A8E3.1010802@sunet.se>
In-Reply-To: <54F4A8E3.1010802@sunet.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/fB_R1O3Eu0vLbsNfIBLQEuTaaq0>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-stox-groupchat-10
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 23:00:38 -0000

On 3/2/15 11:16 AM, Leif Johansson wrote:
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
> security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
> these comments just like any other last call comments.
>
> This draft is imo as ready as it is likely to be from a security
> perspective. The security considerations section does contain an
> I-D reference (draft-ietf-simple-chat) which needs to be resolved
> before publication though.
Hi Leif, thanks for the review. BTW, draft-ietf-simple-chat has been 
blocked for a long time on draft-ietf-precis-nickname, which should soon 
enter IETF Last Call (following on the recent approval of 
draft-ietf-precis-framework).

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email