[secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-16

David Mandelberg via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 05 November 2021 21:23 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CF63A0FB6; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Mandelberg via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.39.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <163614739072.15769.17894970681813473446@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: David Mandelberg <david@mandelberg.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 14:23:10 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/gZkBnqQzKhT_6-XGHSf5Z5dhzXM>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-16
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 21:23:11 -0000

Reviewer: David Mandelberg
Review result: Has Nits

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready with nits.

(nit) I thought section 5.1.3 was going to have an example of what "reasonably frequently" means?