Re: [secdir] SecDir Review of draft-ietf-lisp-alt-09

Catherine Meadows <meadows@itd.nrl.navy.mil> Mon, 28 November 2011 23:37 UTC

Return-Path: <meadows@itd.nrl.navy.mil>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C8A21F8C34; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:37:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FnF+hZNh+P08; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:37:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fw5540.nrl.navy.mil (fw5540.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.196.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0686821F8B3F; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:37:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chacs.nrl.navy.mil (sun1.fw5540.net [10.0.0.11]) by fw5540.nrl.navy.mil (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pASNbbws017648; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:37:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from chacs.nrl.navy.mil (sun1 [10.0.0.11]) by chacs.nrl.navy.mil (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id pASNbaMT020623; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:37:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from siduri.fw5540.net ([10.0.3.73]) by chacs.nrl.navy.mil (SMSSMTP 4.1.16.48) with SMTP id M2011112818373605596 ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:37:36 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-18-619484849"
From: Catherine Meadows <meadows@itd.nrl.navy.mil>
In-Reply-To: <20111128225107.GB17970@vaf-mac1.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:47:48 -0500
Message-Id: <4DE4BC20-2C43-4311-BDB7-DEF871460580@itd.nrl.navy.mil>
References: <EDF32EE2-6FB1-4A08-8AF5-3F912EF562D0@itd.nrl.navy.mil> <20111128225107.GB17970@vaf-mac1.cisco.com>
To: Vince Fuller <vaf@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, Catherine Meadows <meadows@itd.nrl.navy.mil>, draft-ietf-lisp-alt.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] SecDir Review of draft-ietf-lisp-alt-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:37:40 -0000

My apologies, I was thinking of the discussion in 10.1.

Cathy

Catherine Meadows
Naval Research Laboratory
Code 5543
4555 Overlook Ave., S.W.
Washington DC, 20375
phone: 202-767-3490
fax: 202-404-7942
email: catherine.meadows@nrl.navy.mil

On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Vince Fuller wrote:

> Thank you for the review.
> 
>> All in all, I think this is a very thorough and well-though-out
>> discussion of the security considerations.  My only suggestion would
>> be to include a forward reference to paragraph 10.3 in the
>> discussion of prefix leakage.
> 
> I can certainly add such a reference as part of the forthcoming -10 draft.
> 
> Can you be more specific about where you feel that the reference belongs?
> It looks like the topic of "route leakage" is mentioned on page 5 in the
> Intoduction section, then in section 6.2 where the suggestion of a separate
> SAFI for LISP+ALT is made, and, finally, in section 10.1.
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 	--Vince
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview