[secdir] draft-ietf-avtcore-rtcp-green-metadata-08 ietf last call Secdir review
Vincent Roca via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 17 June 2026 12:45 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from [10.244.21.151] (unknown [4.156.85.76]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684ED102B933E; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 05:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1781700314; bh=Ga5N1OGcw4m2Ib+xNfz+447iY4oWsu70+8iBjVVGdi4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:Date; b=vpViHIxL0BjqVxukmXfz7mooAP+0P1Ho2A3Hv3dNylLTb+673owbXSEitIhn095hS edVJjxiXhDUVwKIesnOs8TMYNMqV8GyZXshkB9kzNvBP0rRbLPGPE1J66gfD0Z3Hd5 7u7+YwFdbiN2wPs4QeGgtP1CuBWUXiTtMq+6s6As=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Vincent Roca via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.67.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <178170031411.626419.15699165149665632605@dt-datatracker-f9b87776f-8pmmg>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 05:45:14 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: X7WVGZABSCDWHXVQIJILC5XWGRY7USV2
X-Message-ID-Hash: X7WVGZABSCDWHXVQIJILC5XWGRY7USV2
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-secdir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: avt@ietf.org, draft-ietf-avtcore-rtcp-green-metadata.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>
Subject: [secdir] draft-ietf-avtcore-rtcp-green-metadata-08 ietf last call Secdir review
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/k4RxKmoM0CCzYCiQBVHeVQgA3oM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:secdir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secdir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secdir-leave@ietf.org>
Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtcp-green-metadata Title: RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Messages for Temporal-Spatial Resolution Reviewer: Vincent Roca Review result: Ready Hello, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Summary: ready Globally, this ID looks ready to me. I only have a small comment: an ID introducing a extension of a given protocol usually starts its "Security Considerations" section with a link to the "Security Consideration" section of base RFC it depends on, since what applies there also applies in general. For instance, RFC 4585 on extended RFC profiles discusses timing attacks that IMHO also apply here (eg. what happens if a malicious entity does not follow timing rules of section 4.2.3). Also, RFC 4585 recommends in its "Security Consideration" section that "Senders as well as receivers SHOULD behave conservatively when observing strange reporting behavior", whereas no such recommendation is done here. Regards, Vincent
- [secdir] draft-ietf-avtcore-rtcp-green-metadata-0… Vincent Roca via Datatracker