[secdir] Security review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-13
"Hilarie Orman" <hilarie@purplestreak.com> Fri, 08 December 2017 06:19 UTC
Return-Path: <hilarie@purplestreak.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1461D1201F2; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 22:19:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ZySUgBpEh-v; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 22:19:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com (out03.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CEF91200C5; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 22:19:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <hilarie@purplestreak.com>) id 1eNC0R-0005sJ-QM; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 23:19:31 -0700
Received: from [72.250.219.84] (helo=rumpleteazer.rhmr.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <hilarie@purplestreak.com>) id 1eNC0Q-0003Jk-Qw; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 23:19:31 -0700
Received: from rumpleteazer.rhmr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rumpleteazer.rhmr.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id vB86JAqi001459; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 23:19:10 -0700
Received: (from hilarie@localhost) by rumpleteazer.rhmr.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id vB86JAMW001453; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 23:19:10 -0700
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 23:19:10 -0700
Message-Id: <201712080619.vB86JAMW001453@rumpleteazer.rhmr.com>
From: Hilarie Orman <hilarie@purplestreak.com>
Reply-To: Hilarie Orman <hilarie@purplestreak.com>
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology.all@tools.ietf.org
X-XM-SPF: eid=1eNC0Q-0003Jk-Qw; ; ; mid=<201712080619.vB86JAMW001453@rumpleteazer.rhmr.com>; ; ; hst=in02.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=72.250.219.84; ; ; frm=hilarie@purplestreak.com; ; ; spf=none
X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/x/mwMPjhO5wal9LOzL5/j
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 72.250.219.84
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: hilarie@purplestreak.com
X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
X-Spam-Combo: ******;iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
X-Spam-Relay-Country:
X-Spam-Timing: total 592 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.06 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.3 (0.6%), b_tie_ro: 2.3 (0.4%), parse: 1.04 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 4.3 (0.7%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.88 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.7 (0.8%), tests_pri_-950: 2.1 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 1.71 (0.3%), tests_pri_-400: 21 (3.6%), check_bayes: 19 (3.2%), b_tokenize: 6 (1.1%), b_tok_get_all: 4.3 (0.7%), b_comp_prob: 3.0 (0.5%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.3 (0.4%), b_finish: 0.79 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 544 (91.8%), check_dkim_signature: 0.81 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 304 (51.4%), tests_pri_500: 6 (1.1%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%)
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/kD8z4x7iho0LKMLkp1ZUAy0-91U>
Subject: [secdir] Security review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-13
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 06:19:35 -0000
(with address correction) Security review of A YANG Data Model for Layer 3 Topologies draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-13.txt Do not be alarmed. I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The security consideration regarding the data model storage and transmission seem to be delineated clearly enough. I call it Ready. Hilarie
- [secdir] Security review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-… Hilarie Orman