Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ymbk-aplusp-08

Tina Tsou <tena@huawei.com> Wed, 26 January 2011 22:47 UTC

Return-Path: <tena@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D563A69EB; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:47:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.348, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0MdE4+9WBvCZ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:47:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usaga02-in.huawei.com (usaga02-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6803A69DD; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:47:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LFN00J8EJFXKY@usaga02-in.huawei.com>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:50:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TingZousc1 ([10.212.246.230]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LFN00M4CJFQNG@usaga02-in.huawei.com>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:50:21 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:50:18 -0800
From: Tina Tsou <tena@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <m2vd1cr6ts.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: 'Randy Bush' <randy@psg.com>
Message-id: <001701cbbdab$6b3ce000$41b6a000$@com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-language: en-us
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Thread-index: Acu82qXBYG9862qhTTOT3oPTAW8HiQA0AorA
References: <01a201cbbcd7$197946c0$4c6bd440$@com> <m2vd1cr6ts.wl%randy@psg.com>
Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, draft-ymbk-aplusp@tools.ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ymbk-aplusp-08
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:47:21 -0000

Best Regards,
Tina TSOU
http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html


-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 1:51 PM
To: Tina Tsou
Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org; secdir@ietf.org; draft-ymbk-aplusp@tools.ietf.org;
iesg@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Review of draft-ymbk-aplusp-08

> Operations directorate and Security directorate reviews are solicited
> primarily to help the area directors improve their efficiency,
particularly
> when preparing for IESG telechats, and allowing them to focus on documents
> requiring their attention and spend less time on the trouble-free ones.

and which are you?  can't be ops, as you are a vendor.  so security?
but we already received the security review.
[Tina:
I know the author is my friend Randy, so I have to be very careful ;-)

I'm a member and also the secretary of Operations directorate.
Here is the wiki page for the Operations directorate.
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/ops/trac/wiki/Directorates
You can see many of us do not have the affiliation of operators.
I did the additional review besides the allocated member's review.

I'm also a member of Security directorate.
I did the additional review besides the allocated member's review.

Hope it clarifies.
]

but thanks for the review anyway.

randy, a bit confused