[secdir] Review of draft-salowey-secsh-uri-00.txt

Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> Sun, 30 January 2011 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <sra@hactrn.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54823A6B48; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:44:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.76
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.76 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.069, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P+gAWpgpcrDJ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:44:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cyteen.hactrn.net (cyteen.hactrn.net [IPv6:2002:425c:4242:0:210:5aff:fe86:1f54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D669F3A6B44; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:44:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from angband.hactrn.net (host-174-45-45-87.gdj-co.client.bresnan.net [174.45.45.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "angband.hactrn.net", Issuer "Grunchweather Associates" (verified OK)) by cyteen.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ECF628451; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:48:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from angband.hactrn.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by angband.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8FD15ED25; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:17:09 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 08:17:09 -0500
From: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, draft-salowey-secsh-uri.all@tools.ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <20110130131709.9D8FD15ED25@angband.hactrn.net>
Subject: [secdir] Review of draft-salowey-secsh-uri-00.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:44:59 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This draft defines URI syntax and semantics for ssh.  The proposed
mechanism is straightforward, and the authors have shown laudable
restraint in defining only the minimum necessary to do the job.

I have no serious security concerns regarding this document, but did
notice one omission: the (otherwise quite good) discussion of the
fingerprint option gives no guidance on interaction with RFC 4255.
Such a discussion need not be very long (a paragraph would do), but
should cover both the presence and absence of a verified DNSSEC
signature for the SSHFP RRset, as the recommendations presumably will
be different for those two cases.