Re: [sfc] New Version Notification for draft-liu-sfc-use-cases-08.txt

+1

Regards,
Yuanlong

-----Original Message-----
From: sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Changcheng Huang
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 8:45 PM
To: Liushucheng (Will); sfc@ietf.org
Cc: draft-liu-sfc-use-cases@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sfc] New Version Notification for draft-liu-sfc-use-cases-08.txt

I think the draft has significantly improved. Those who are against adopting this draft should clearly state why they are against so that the authors can further improve the draft. Otherwise they should be considered support as the chairs have been doing for other drafts.

Regards,

Chang

-----Original Message-----
From: Liushucheng (Will) [mailto:liushucheng@huawei.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 7:25 AM
To: sfc@ietf.org
Cc: draft-liu-sfc-use-cases@tools.ietf.org
Subject: FW: New Version Notification for draft-liu-sfc-use-cases-08.txt

Hi all,

According to the minutes of last IETF meeting:
	Thomas Narten: There was a fair amount of support earlier to have one document. Now there are other use case drafts. It is up to the WG to decide how to go forward.
	(?): Document is very comprehensive and useful for operators.
	Ken Gray: Agree with Thomas. With multiple documents its hard to find unique requirements across many. That is what I would like to see.
	(?): Good for WG adoption.
	Jim Guichard: How many have read the document? About 20.
	Thomas Narten: Should we have separate document? How many like to adopt vs not adopt? No clear consensus in the room for adoption. Continue to discuss on-list.

In last IETF meeting, there were around 20 persons who supported to adopt this draft. As suggested by Chairs, we updated our draft and wish to continue the discussion here to get more people support us. The main changes are:
1. Cut the problems listed in mobile use case
2. Addressed the comments from Dave Dolson about the bidirectional link.
3. Updated the reference.

Please let us know your thought, thanks!

Regards,
Will

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 6:58 PM
To: Qiong Sun; Jiafeng Zhu; Changcheng Huang; Nicolai Leymann; Hongyu Li (Julio); Liushucheng (Will); Fu Qiao; Qiong Sun; Peng He; Qiao Fu; Changcheng Huang; Mohamed Boucadair; Nicolai Leymann; Huangyong (Oliver); Mohamed Boucadair; Peng He; Chuong Pham; Jiafeng Zhu; Liushucheng (Will); Hongyu Li (Julio); Chuong Pham; Huangyong (Oliver)
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-liu-sfc-use-cases-08.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-liu-sfc-use-cases-08.txt has been successfully submitted by Will(Shucheng) Liu and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-liu-sfc-use-cases
Revision:	08
Title:		Service Function Chaining (SFC) General Use Cases
Document date:	2014-09-17
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		19
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-liu-sfc-use-cases-08.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-sfc-use-cases/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liu-sfc-use-cases-08
Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-liu-sfc-use-cases-08

Abstract:
   The delivery of value-added services relies on the invocation of
   advanced Service Functions in a sequential order.  This mechanism is
   called Service Function Chaining (SFC).  The set of involved Service
   Functions and their order depends on the service context and other
   deployment-specific considerations.

   Having a single use case document eases the effort of deriving
   requirements that are to be met by SFC solution(s).  Moreover, it
   allows to identify commonalities between the various use cases that
   are of interest.  This document presents a set of general use cases
   of Service Function Chaining (SFC).

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc