[sfc] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-00.txt
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Mon, 24 April 2017 06:38 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454B8128B90 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 23:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Ehy-L6R5b7B for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 23:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x232.google.com (mail-io0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1856F128BA2 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 23:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x232.google.com with SMTP id r16so174700514ioi.2 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 23:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rE/W+ze8As1d60qDR3NQGjZQd8ni/6RCUYOeXEctCeU=; b=tDEbvvenSk812CbYqAefdciaGvdP6FWdwagn12vv1I1iT4N0glxKeKYc37MH5QoaPA 8V7lFQkrZn1ix50EprE5ARKGLrtr/uZ6esl6bux1GiND0g6zSUe9peSYvweix9YLLGS8 pzmkv6M13BnrO7Z77iz+8sDOy0U+rFZzwQJ5hNe2BEOJSBO50W6+H74Jf38ViJlcTXAI zsilKYYY7fZSd30sW0xc8PLT92iZwGNy1P3sSNfqKeQZdxhWvevrkLe7OY74JmqJN+qT qgA+ASCeX1QeLWTIRUswmQvcvJJ1yQSdnhpC71HKlxV76/ENxNgTLiHUy6jBn/43wMQ2 go7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=rE/W+ze8As1d60qDR3NQGjZQd8ni/6RCUYOeXEctCeU=; b=KiYvS3sk0q036VaorvHA04aAanDynFaE76PkMZ6aBvNE94awLD3knriJ7FaRmSy1Fi zN1kscua0W7KxWiowSXP3AnHRnz4pB16IdII0aPthGsfdjdxqFLRbILRF8oN0fPQfsHq WxkLCdn8xquuNvrl4jhsYDSfi0A3SLn2wKEziQVTJsP5wnNdZrdDDBMTSITqtBbphkoh rsfR12jbIOtsAwSuWWUZxHGUubmKE9WN/qo/g3SHBY1lqeu1LqMgKMZ2t8ryKsXu2Wen lX27ZJavv0vAWP6IzBG0CUTXKgLoE+aCO78Mo/4QTAsCNNKWbxzywdmxaKxa9vfGPMd9 GA4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/606LHQFY2oJ6vr7IZ8Bfvuks0XLU7+k9lTcaefRTTKL/lnqybB ZExNQht5DdO6xTInnuj7vTSnxOPa4w==
X-Received: by 10.202.235.196 with SMTP id j187mr12810282oih.167.1493015891362; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 23:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.52.118 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 23:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <149301550360.25857.13262494361152306223.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <149301550360.25857.13262494361152306223.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 23:38:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmU29uURzPetwrCJtQ9J-NK1Ptp8_DJLb9k14ZxfTcW8yQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: sfc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cf63ed976ce054de3d96d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/adj_52zb3aDlh2c7PbAzFYOrwvs>
Subject: [sfc] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-00.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 06:38:15 -0000
Dear All, this new draft introduces the Alternate Marking method into SFC environment. In order to realize advantages of the Alternate Marking method, the draft requests allocation of the Mark field in the NSH Base header. Greatly appreciate your reviews, comments, and questions. Regards, Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> Date: Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:31 PM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-00.txt To: Gregory Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, Giuseppe Fioccola < giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it> A new version of I-D, draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm Revision: 00 Title: Performance Measurement (PM) with Alternate Marking Method in Service Function Chaining (SFC) Domain Document date: 2017-04-23 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 7 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm- 00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-00 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mirsky-sfc- pmamm-00 Abstract: This document describes how the alternate marking method be used as the passive performance measurement method in a Service Function Chaining (SFC) domain. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat