IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis-03

Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Tue, 14 April 2015 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851AF1ACDAB for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OJq2jcMqO8Fw for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB0F31ACD6B for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D6828B0041; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:49:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8318F1F8035; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:49:04 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4E7501C0-63D9-4E36-B3D6-A8D01E399674"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150401192116.6786D1712A31@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:49:02 -0400
Message-Id: <AC4C3920-0562-4339-81C7-931232E7C239@tislabs.com>
References: <D13889F3.2237A%oliver.borchert@nist.gov> <048e9e0eb7a311408c1cb07d192c8894@mail.mandelberg.org> <m2wq1w9zn4.wl%randy@psg.com> <551BFCAF.8050309@mandelberg.org> <20150401192116.6786D1712A31@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
To: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/VVPnpigINXefB9b0fGk47sLmyis>
Cc: sidr@ietf.org, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis-03
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:49:26 -0000

The wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis-03 ended just before IETF92.  Then this energetic discussion followed the end of the wglc, but seems to have substance.

Do the authors have a clear picture of the changes needed to the draft to proceed with a new version?

--Sandy


On Apr 1, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> wrote:

> David, I think a simpler way to express the semantics you want is just
> to consider the protocol version number to be part of the session
> identifier.  That way, a version 0 session can never match a version 1
> session, by definition, full stop.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email