Re: [Sidrops] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-https-tal-07: (with COMMENT)

[Tim Bruijnzeels <[e-mail]>]

Hi Mirja,

Sure, I will add a small section.

Tim

> On 9 Apr 2019, at 16:47, Mirja Kuehlewind <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Tim,
> 
> See below.
> 
>> On 9. Apr 2019, at 16:43, Tim Bruijnzeels <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Mirja,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 3 Apr 2019, at 14:18, Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> COMMENT:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Usually we recommend to have a "Changes since RFC7730" section in bis
>>> documents... however, maybe the changes are small enough in this doc that that
>>> is not needed.
>>> 
>> 
>> We have this line in both the abstract and introduction:
>> 
>> This document obsoletes the previous definition of Trust Anchor Locators in 
>> RFC 7730 by adding support for HTTPS URIs.
>> 
>> I would think that this is enough, but I have no issues with an explicit section if people find it useful.
> 
> Yes, usually we have a whole section with bullet points in addition to mentioning it in the abstract and intro, usually as a subsection in the intro or somewhere in the appendix at the end of the doc. It’s very helpful for AD reviewing bis docs :-) but the main purpose is to provide a quick overview to implementers who want to update their existing implementation. Please consider if you think that could also be useful for this doc. As I said, usually we have it and I think I didn’t see a bis doc for a while that didn’t have it.
> 
> Mirja
> 
>