IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Change to "reject" action: compatible with fileinto/redirect?

"Nigel Swinson" <Nigel.Swinson@rockliffe.com> Thu, 28 April 2005 10:51 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j3SAp8WK067065; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 03:51:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id j3SAp8Fx067064; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 03:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from rockpub4.rockliffe.com (rockpub4.rockliffe.com [147.208.128.11]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j3SAp7IM066997 for <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 03:51:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Nigel.Swinson@rockliffe.com)
X-Spam-Score: 1
Received: from nigelhome (unverified [10.42.24.208]) by rockliffe.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.1.19) with ESMTP id <B0003512382@mail.rockliffe.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 03:51:01 -0700
Message-ID: <004201c54be0$29b6cad0$1bea2952@nigelhome>
From: Nigel Swinson <Nigel.Swinson@rockliffe.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: MTA filtering mailing list <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>
References: <426FDE09.3090007@isode.com>
Subject: Re: Change to "reject" action: compatible with fileinto/redirect?
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:50:56 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by above.proper.com id j3SAp7IM067042
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

> Matthew has asked this question before and I've heard no opinions. I 
> just want to hear explicit confirmations/objections to the idea of 
> allowing "reject" to be compatible with "fileinto" and "redirect".

If you send me mail, then I want to be able to do whatever I want with it.  So if I want to reject it to tell the user that I hated their mail (as opposed to the weaker discard), then I might also want to archive a copy in a "Rejected" folder, or perhaps forward onto some kind of abuse@ email address.

Nigel

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status