Re: [sip-overload] rate-control and event-package drafts and normative references

Charles Shen <charles@cs.columbia.edu> Wed, 18 December 2013 00:27 UTC

Return-Path: <charles.newyork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78691ADF30 for <sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:27:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q-APw7fpqKpW for <sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:27:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8A71ADEC0 for <sip-overload@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:27:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wm4so7207604obc.10 for <sip-overload@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:27:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=YZaDZ9qkGuxyb/SXDJ5FyBkJ3HedAIh7dsidnyHjUL8=; b=eQD16cnEyDXQLlKn4Xf1VINGMJ16LBaRSrMLvd3RbSGSLCjxCR4jGdPMazNppIALP7 FatnBtXIhUO4in1m5C4yEu/T5hJs+UFmlB4NAIS/OCltQyGadqQS1vfYN9nRxcZIPt7z K1isUVe7/nkbUzJsDZa+Exad6somCZ9xuw2VjjX1pUgO7w8mihuLS35/TgY1VN6ZiIyQ 0hFEh8rQtNQnLTH7vUaWeUm0oL7TQlXnqBhbnsomWRcPcQ+KuoevVCsakC/99iAC8RK3 OdQgkBMpm0jzC5uHi7qbk2n7Rws1A7dI4iWnnZBeJt4C+3tZ30EwkbXO4k87B7uWG0iV hwvQ==
X-Received: by 10.182.255.137 with SMTP id aq9mr502040obd.80.1387326467364; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:27:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: charles.newyork@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.27.9 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:27:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0FA8D2@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <52B058CC.1050508@bell-labs.com> <CAPSQ9ZXeR59u=GEoQBiVW1habRb7xVchDwd8obNxjedJHvsTXQ@mail.gmail.com> <52B07019.80501@bell-labs.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0FA8D2@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
From: Charles Shen <charles@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:27:27 +0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: MqqYTLKwEXI_lvgDCd_TauSdPvw
Message-ID: <CAPSQ9ZUHuM_Jd0qpYiBYBoF-D0rfO3fN9sGgVPHnLLtYoMtJSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134a71a465ea004edc41d8b
Cc: "sip-overload@ietf.org" <sip-overload@ietf.org>, "Gurbani, Vijay K \(Vijay\)" <vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: [sip-overload] rate-control and event-package drafts and normative references
X-BeenThere: sip-overload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Overload <sip-overload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-overload/>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:27:51 -0000

Hi Keith, Just want to make sure your +1 is for "leaving it as
informative", is that correct or not?

I feel the most direct interaction between this draft and the
overload-control one is when you specify the numbers in the actions, such
as a rate. However, since it does not use the oc-parameter as Vijay
mentioned, and the computation of those numbers is also out of scope of
this document, It seems ok to leave it as informative.

Thanks

Charles

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:54 AM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) <
keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>; wrote:

> I was about to respond saying pretty much what you have said below.
>
> So treat this as a +1.
>
> Keith
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sip-overload [mailto:sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Vijay K. Gurbani
> > Sent: 17 December 2013 15:39
> > To: Charles Shen
> > Cc: sip-overload@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [sip-overload] rate-control and event-package
> > drafts and normative references
> >
> > On 12/17/2013 09:31 AM, Charles Shen wrote:
> > > Hi Vijay, I will update it in the next version. Thanks!
> >
> > Charles: I was looking at event-package draft and I think
> > that perhaps it is not necessary for you to upgrade the
> > reference to normative.
> >
> > event-package essentially fleshes out a rfc6665 event
> > package; as such it does not ask the actors to use overload
> > control parameters defined in the overload-control draft.
> >
> > So it looks like an informative references from your document
> > suffices.
> >
> > The rate-control document will most definitely need to move
> > the reference to normative since it uses the overload control
> > parameters defined in the overload-control draft.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > - vijay
> > --
> > Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960
> > Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
> > Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
> > Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar:
> > http://goo.gl/x3Ogq _______________________________________________
> > sip-overload mailing list
> > sip-overload@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload
> >