[Sip] Issue with the Timestamp grammar in RFC-3261
Prasanna <prasanna@huawei.com> Thu, 22 January 2004 05:35 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA26998 for <sip-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:35:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AjXUy-0005fJ-Ft for sip-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:35:25 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0M5ZOna021716 for sip-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:35:24 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AjXUd-0005dS-Fh; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:35:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AjXUB-0005cW-8f for sip@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:34:35 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA26984 for <sip@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:34:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AjXU8-0000mt-00 for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:34:32 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AjXTG-0000li-00 for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:33:39 -0500
Received: from mta0.huawei.com ([61.144.161.41] helo=huawei.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AjXSj-0000i2-00 for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:33:06 -0500
Received: from huawei08hiby56 (huawei.com [172.17.1.62]) by mta0.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 0.8 (built Jul 12 2002)) with ESMTPA id <0HRV009S6LZTYW@mta0.huawei.com> for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:31:07 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:05:47 +0530
From: Prasanna <prasanna@huawei.com>
To: dean.willis@softarmor.com, sip@ietf.org, rohan@cisco.com, lavis@huawei.com
Message-id: <000001c3e0a9$97ddb490$e905120a@huawei08hiby56>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Sip] Issue with the Timestamp grammar in RFC-3261
Sender: sip-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
I feel the grammar of the Timestamp header is buggy.
The grammar being
Timestamp = "Timestamp" HCOLON 1*(DIGIT)
[ "." *(DIGIT) ] [ LWS delay ]
delay = *(DIGIT) [ "." *(DIGIT) ]
Can allow the following two cases which makes no sense
Timestamp : 1.
Timestamp : 1.0 .
Should'nt a bug be raised against this to update the grammar to
Timestamp = "Timestamp" HCOLON 1*(DIGIT)
[ "." 1*(DIGIT) ] [ LWS delay ]
delay = 1*(DIGIT) [ "." 1*(DIGIT) ]
Thanks for the patient reading.
Cheers,
Prasanna
*****************************************************************
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is
listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way
(including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure,
reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!
*****************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
- [Sip] Issue with the Timestamp grammar in RFC-3261 Prasanna
- RE: [Sip] Issue with the Timestamp grammar in RFC… Rosen, Brian
- RE: [Sip] Issue with the Timestamp grammar in RFC… Prasanna
- Re: [Sip] Issue with the Timestamp grammar in RFC… Jonathan Rosenberg