RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed ECRIT charter

At 11:20 AM 10/28/2004 +0200, Tschofenig Hannes wrote:
>hi james,
>
>some data items seem to be part of the pidf-lo work.

each of items below are or are not part of the pidf-lo. No other fields in 
a SIP message should carry them, therefore this is part of the geopriv wg

>however, as nadine
>mentioned there are additional fields:
>- Customer Name,
>- Class of Service--Residence, Business, Public, etc.
>- information about/from a VoIP/Communications Service Provider
>
>this information is not included in the pidf-lo.
>
>is this use case for saml you are often talking about?

saml asserts a trait, which none of the above are, each above is individual 
or personal, not a trait

>ciao
>hannes
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James M. Polk [mailto:jmpolk@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Oktober 2004 17:33
> > To: Abbott, Nadine B.; Peterson, Jon
> > Cc: sipping-emergency@ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: [Sipping-emergency] New revision of proposed
> > ECRIT charter
> >
> > Isn't most of this an extension to the PIDF-LO effort in
> > Geopriv, and not part of ECRIT?
> >
> > The portion that I believe is part of SIP/PING would be the
> > addition of a body part by the VSP (in add the contact info
> > you want) - which has so far been frowned upon (to say the
> > least) in these WGs
> >
> > At 10:57 AM 10/21/2004 -0400, Abbott, Nadine B. wrote:
> > >Jon,
> > >
> > >In the North American National Emergency Number Association
> > (NENA) VoIP
> > >Location WG, we have been grappling with the problem of how
> > additional
> > >information relevant to an emergency call might be carried to the
> > emergency
> > >call taker.  For example, this might include information about the
> > caller
> > >(e.g., Customer Name, Class of Service--Residence, Business, Public,
> > etc.)
> > >and information about/from a VoIP/Communications Service Provider
> > (e.g.,
> > >contact information for that provider) that are relevant to an
> > emergency
> > >call.  We are not yet ready (before this next meeting) to provide a
> > list of
> > >proposed requirements.
> > >However, I wondered if you consider that the charter for ECRIT, as
> > written,
> > >covers the issue of how such information--caller supplied and/or
> > service
> > >provider supplied--might be carried in SIP?
> > >
> > >Respectfully,
> > >Nadine Abbott
> > >NENA VoIP Location WG team leader
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Sipping-emergency mailing list
> > >Sipping-emergency@ietf.org
> > >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-emergency
> >
> >
> > cheers,
> > James
> >
> >                                 *******************
> >                  Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sipping-emergency mailing list
> > Sipping-emergency@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-emergency
> >

cheers,
James

                                *******************
                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented

_______________________________________________
Sipping-emergency mailing list
Sipping-emergency@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping-emergency