Re: [smartobjectdir] Call for Review of draft-iab-smart-object-architecture-04.txt, "Architectural Considerations in Smart Object Networking"

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Wed, 03 September 2014 05:41 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: smartobjectdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smartobjectdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442541A6FDD; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.568
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dUUIEzDga-uP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB1581A6FDB; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mb-aye.local (c-67-188-0-113.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.0.113]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s835fJO9019836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 3 Sep 2014 05:41:20 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <5406A9FC.9090308@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:41:16 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/32.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IAB <iab@iab.org>, IETF Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
References: <D1D25EE7-9B6F-47BD-9D39-3EC8B9288D98@iab.org>
In-Reply-To: <D1D25EE7-9B6F-47BD-9D39-3EC8B9288D98@iab.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="44QWurGD16apnw1u9MqFvnHOo9gLCtdXF"
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 05:41:20 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smartobjectdir/SeCWVhIj2kdfCW8w4cVEvdTgsNo
Cc: IETF SmartObjectDir <smartobjectdir@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [smartobjectdir] Call for Review of draft-iab-smart-object-architecture-04.txt, "Architectural Considerations in Smart Object Networking"
X-BeenThere: smartobjectdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <smartobjectdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smartobjectdir>, <mailto:smartobjectdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/smartobjectdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:smartobjectdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smartobjectdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smartobjectdir>, <mailto:smartobjectdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 05:41:22 -0000

   it has to be shipped with a secure default
   configuration (which includes no default accounts, no debugging
   interfaces enabled, etc.),

The security considerations  section doesn't grapple with the problem of
bootstrapping or the establishment of trust, but does address the
question of default properties. under conditions where device are only
useful because they are connected those are not easily separable.

On 8/27/14 11:18 AM, IAB Chair wrote:
> This is a call for review of "Architectural Considerations in Smart Object Networking" prior to potential approval as an IAB stream RFC.
> 
> The document is available for inspection here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-smart-object-architecture/
> 
> The Call for Review will last until 24 September 2014.  Please send comments to iab@iab.org.
> 
> On behalf of the IAB,
>    Russ Housley
>    IAB Chair
> 
>