Re: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3125 (5901)

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 05:38 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327D6120255 for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:38:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bXLG3THHwd5q for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:38:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA68C120013 for <smime@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:38:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id n4so23310278qte.2 for <smime@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:38:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=HBJ3EgLrbDfCpIaYu64Q5fO2sbDNyDnYtXTqHIPwrUk=; b=lbdR25YMMNdh8rj4lFuaV3jCfn2ddPCAjF02ctkFR301+EP1jOi3s/JruaU43/ouoQ sC/YddQvfgWXeL0Q8L8irbXaD2d3GuIsF/gPmOZHZXchN+q/z2cr+7LH7mKyG0/Ik8HH G+IrMN1HNdNYZyLI+MeO9G98sGz/eLO9UHkQk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=HBJ3EgLrbDfCpIaYu64Q5fO2sbDNyDnYtXTqHIPwrUk=; b=E8bgzjqzYRz0pj+pPqCjXDae39Nc40EKkDA0i1fAcHv6/ZXFVyvgK9qVeTORrpiDZQ YuLlMkxUwg74bZjQNJ0uyZeHi+0Y8kGC1+IczWnunBN2zWEVOq7eRti0I7FEFz6OeM6H /ddybIZbBeQxlC0Sfu7yTAukYl8scEu3geaSMEBGOppqFZnNiBp1pmlV4O2Aov4xMoEM Hcgn01zwjmd1+QsWjcr9nLN6iNwmKjn0ELQpYNXiBAm0WoLDnp069dDXLjykngbT9Ibq BhBMFGEjp+yrRD51/ufas4TAJAYY9+oSNKR8Cshx4VS8vC+WHDTOyA/Wm9bKC3Hn02mx v34A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVFlVeO863oiA8fjlr7X7JxKMW0O7uVaFJey+zlfmRr6jwo1VTx pjp9tCksYTHcEwRjI87K4KHWlQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz8FW1A0cTxrmJbpV6mLTd/MRfNq4g9knJR8jMWe8i9JUfYLg+McSKoIEdvbwo5iXxHhQirfg==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:73c6:: with SMTP id v6mr31278097qtp.137.1574141907632; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:38:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:a9c9:1625:2953:9b6d? ([2001:67c:370:128:a9c9:1625:2953:9b6d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r4sm9060339qkd.9.2019.11.18.21.38.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:38:27 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20191112160525.0BA7FF4072C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:38:21 +0800
Cc: harri.rasilainen@etsi.fr, ross@secstan.com, Denis.Pinkas@bull.net, pope@secstan.com, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, Blake Ramsdell <blaker@gmail.com>, smime@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F2BB4876-21C5-4531-B460-6DAE8B06C2EB@sn3rd.com>
References: <20191112160525.0BA7FF4072C@rfc-editor.org>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/bXq_4-t4xEHZ7R9rvZBT06jAtH8>
Subject: Re: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3125 (5901)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:38:34 -0000

Option B is to import CommitmentTypeIdentifier from FROM PKIXTSP, but these seems like the easier approach.

I reviewed this and believe this errata is correct and should be approved. 

spt

> On Nov 13, 2019, at 00:05, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3125,
> "Electronic Signature Policies".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5901
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
> 
> Section: Appendix A.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> CommitmentType ::= SEQUENCE {
>        identifier                      CommitmentTypeIdentifier,
>        fieldOfApplication      [0] FieldOfApplication OPTIONAL,
>        semantics                       [1] DirectoryString OPTIONAL }
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> CommitmentType ::= SEQUENCE {
>        identifier                      CommitmentTypeIdentifier,
>        fieldOfApplication      [0] FieldOfApplication OPTIONAL,
>        semantics                       [1] DirectoryString OPTIONAL }
> 
> CommitmentTypeIdentifier ::= OBJECT IDENTIFIER
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The definition of CommitmentTypeIdentifier is missing from the ASN.1 module.  RFC 3126 shows that it is an object identifier.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC3125 (draft-ietf-smime-espolicies-00)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Electronic Signature Policies
> Publication Date    : September 2001
> Author(s)           : J. Ross, D. Pinkas, N. Pope
> Category            : EXPERIMENTAL
> Source              : S/MIME Mail Security
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> smime mailing list
> smime@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime