[smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5753 (4777)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 13 August 2016 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E5112D5BE for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.869
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.869 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5XGpMunFGUYA for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3106712D5B2 for <smime@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 15CF8B80D57; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
To: turners@ieca.com, dbrown@certicom.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, blaker@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160813213421.15CF8B80D57@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:34:21 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/fokddNk5izTevkIQRb3TMTTCWrk>
Cc: ietf@augustcellars.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, smime@ietf.org
Subject: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5753 (4777)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 21:34:22 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5753,
"Use of Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Algorithms in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5753&eid=4777

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>

Section: 3.1.1

Original Text
-------------
-  originator MUST be the alternative originatorKey.  The
      originatorKey algorithm field MUST contain the id-ecPublicKey
      object identifier (see Section 7.1.2).  The parameters associated
      with id-ecPublicKey MUST be absent, ECParameters, or NULL.  The
      parameters associated with id-ecPublicKey SHOULD be absent or
      ECParameters, and NULL is allowed to support legacy
      implementations.  The previous version of this document required
      NULL to be present.  If the parameters are ECParameters, then they
      MUST be namedCurve.  The originatorKey publicKey field MUST
      contain the DER encoding of the value of the ASN.1 type ECPoint
      (see Section 7.2), which represents the sending agent's ephemeral
      EC public key.  The ECPoint in uncompressed form MUST be
      supported.

Corrected Text
--------------
-  originator MUST be the alternative originatorKey.  The
      originatorKey algorithm field MUST contain the id-ecPublicKey
      object identifier (see Section 7.1.2).  The parameters associated
      with id-ecPublicKey MUST be absent, ECParameters, or NULL.  The
      parameters associated with id-ecPublicKey SHOULD be absent or
      ECParameters, and NULL is allowed to support legacy
      implementations.  The previous version of this document required
      NULL to be present.  If the parameters are ECParameters, then they
      MUST be namedCurve.  The originatorKey publicKey field MUST
      contain the encoded public key as defined in [X9.62].  The hybred
      form MUST NOT be used.  The ECPoint in uncompressed form MUST be
      supported.  This mirrors the same format used in public key 
      certificates as defined in Section 2.2 of [RFC5480].

Notes
-----
There is a problem in that for ECPoints, the public key is defined to be encoded differently in this document than it is in a public key certificate.  The difference is the presence of the ASN.1 OCTET STRING wrapper.

OpenSSL and BouncyCastle both use the unwrapped version per Dr. Stephen Henson note to me in mail.

This error is also present in sections 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 7.2

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5753 (draft-ietf-smime-3278bis-09)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Use of Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Algorithms in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
Publication Date    : January 2010
Author(s)           : S. Turner, D. Brown
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : S/MIME Mail Security
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG