Re: RE: New SMTP response codes

John C Klensin <klensin@mci.net> Fri, 16 May 1997 02:22 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa22346; 15 May 97 22:22 EDT
Received: from mail.proper.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22710; 15 May 97 22:22 EDT
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id TAA12868 for ietf-smtp-bks; Thu, 15 May 1997 19:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a4.jck.com (ns.jck.com [206.99.215.40]) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA12863; Thu, 15 May 1997 19:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tp7.Jck.com ("port 2204"@[206.99.215.42]) by a4.jck.com (PMDF V5.1-8 #21705) with SMTP id <0EA94GXCN00MG1@a4.jck.com>; Thu, 15 May 1997 22:05:21 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 22:05:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: John C Klensin <klensin@mci.net>
Subject: Re: RE: New SMTP response codes
To: "Jeff Stephenson (Exchange)" <jeffstep@exchange.microsoft.com>
Cc: "Paul E. Hoffman" <phoffman@imc.org>, ietf-smtp@imc.org
Reply-to: John C Klensin <klensin@mci.net>
Message-id: <SIMEON.9705152220.K@tp7.Jck.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Simeon for Win32 Version 4.1.1 Build (14)
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
X-Authentication: none
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@imc.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 14 May 1997 09:46:39 -0700 "Jeff Stephenson 
(Exchange)" <jeffstep@Exchange.Microsoft.com>; wrote:

> John - would this be appropriate to include in your 821bis draft, or is
> it out of scope?  If it can't go into 821bis, what would be the best way
> to proceed?

I fear that  it is out of scope, but would happily accept 
direction from Chris/Harald/Keith to the contrary.  The 
biggest problem is that we can't make a normative reference 
to the extended code idea from 821bis without creating a 
queuing situation.

     john