RE: SNMP-manageable private MIB
"J. Dave Smith" <smith_jd@ncp.gpt.co.uk> Fri, 25 February 1994 10:48 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01644; 25 Feb 94 5:48 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01640; 25 Feb 94 5:48 EST
Received: from relay.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03561; 25 Feb 94 5:48 EST
Received: by relay.tis.com; id AA19196; Fri, 25 Feb 94 05:36:45 EST
Received: from magellan.tis.com(192.33.112.124) by relay via smap (V1.3mjr) id smaa19187; Fri Feb 25 05:36:38 1994
Received: from magellan.tis.com by magellan.TIS.COM id aa15978; 25 Feb 94 5:28 EST
Received: from sol.tis.com by magellan.TIS.COM id aa15974; 25 Feb 94 5:20 EST
Received: from relay.tis.com by tis.com (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA21180; Fri, 25 Feb 94 05:19:47 EST
Received: by relay.tis.com; id AA19071; Fri, 25 Feb 94 05:20:41 EST
Received: from eros.britain.eu.net(192.91.199.2) by relay via smap (V1.3mjr) id sma019048; Fri Feb 25 05:20:00 1994
Received: from ncp.gpt.co.uk by eros.britain.eu.net with UUCP id <g.20934-0@eros.britain.eu.net>; Fri, 25 Feb 1994 10:19:12 +0000
Received: from hb2 by cyclops with SMTP (5.67/16.2) id AA25975; Thu, 24 Feb 94 18:38:17 GMT
Received: by cvap1x ( 5.52 (84)/CVAP1X-10) id AA07623; Thu, 24 Feb 94 18:28:35 GMT
Received: by levx16.local (5.57-CSCdebug/Ultrix3.0-C) id AA03747; Thu, 24 Feb 94 18:35:30 GMT
Received: from umc by levx16 via MR/LEVX52 with conversational-MRIF; Thu, 24 Feb 94 18:35:29 +0000
Posted: Thu, 24 Feb 94 18:18:01 +0000
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 1994 18:14:01 +0000
X-Orig-Sender: smith_jd@ncp.gpt.co.uk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "J. Dave Smith" <smith_jd@ncp.gpt.co.uk>
Message-Id: <85528142204991/388820@BEA1>
To: Laurence Crutcher <laurence@mvision.com>
Cc: snmpv2@tis.com, snmp@psi.com
Subject: RE: SNMP-manageable private MIB
Msg-Class: ALL-IN-1 IOS Server for VMS V3.0 PBL123A BRITISH 21-MAR-1992
[This message is converted from WPS-PLUS to ASCII] I share the interest in private MIBs although for different reasons. In ECMA we have started work on standardising an extension to SNMP to support PABXs. Obviously this will need to be implemented as a seperate MIB which will be considered private by other Internet SNMP implementations. Thus we would be very interested in learning about any problems, and better yet, solutions. J.Dave Smith [Convener ECMA TC32-TG12]
- SNMP-manageable private MIB Laurence Crutcher
- RE: SNMP-manageable private MIB J. Dave Smith