Re: [solace] Status of solace?
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 26 December 2013 06:17 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: solace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: solace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239AA1AE16F for <solace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 22:17:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iczrep9GHIEC for <solace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 22:17:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006421AE15B for <solace@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 22:17:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBQ6HCne015100; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 07:17:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.105] (p5489053C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.5.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEAE4608; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 07:17:11 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <31520.1387999635@sandelman.ca>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 07:17:10 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <38795453-B168-4C8B-9F00-F9E495B60743@tzi.org>
References: <52BAE676.3070000@gmx.net> <31520.1387999635@sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, solace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [solace] Status of solace?
X-BeenThere: solace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Smart Object Lifecycle Architecture for Constrained Environments\" discussion list" <solace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/solace>, <mailto:solace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/solace/>
List-Post: <mailto:solace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:solace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/solace>, <mailto:solace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 06:17:26 -0000
On 25 Dec 2013, at 20:27, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote: >> I am wondering what the status of Solace (see >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/solace) is. No new messages since March >> this year. > > I think it has little purpose, and 100% overlap with ACE. As should be obvious from the names, ACE is half of SOLACE. More seriously, if we do ACE right, it will cover much of the low-hanging fruit of SOLACE. Over time, it can evolve to cover the rest that is achievable. Sp the subscribers of this list should definitely have a look over at ACE: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/core/trac/wiki/ACE_charter as well as the drafts linked from there. Grüße, Carsten
- Re: [solace] Status of solace? Michael Richardson
- [solace] Status of solace? Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [solace] Status of solace? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [solace] Status of solace? Michael Richardson