Re: [lamps] Revocation Request Format?

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

On 02/03/18 22:33, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> That's why I think an effort to standardize there is bad, not good, because
> it counterintuitively fragments the ecosystem, without addressing the
> general issue, which is in my view is moreso a matter of policy, because of
> the inherent constraints of 2).

FWIW, I don't agree with your conclusion that *any* standardisation
of revocation signals would be counter-productive, but I also don't
think we ought do any such standardisation unless there are a bunch
of CAs and writers of private key handling s/w who do in fact want
to use the same new format for revocation signalling. I don't see a
whole bunch of CAs and others wanting that right now.

So in the short term, I think we agree as to what to (not) do:-)

Cheers,
S.