[lamps] [IANA #1435494] Early review: draft-ietf-lamps-x509-alg-none-10 (IETF 124)
Amanda Baber via RT <iana-issues-comment@iana.org> Thu, 30 October 2025 22:34 UTC
Return-Path: <iana-shared@iana.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B517F2ED82; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.079
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iana.org
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rSNI33AjWUcQ; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB3E87F2ED6F; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request7.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E221E670E; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 22:34:17 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.lax.icann.org 5E221E670E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iana.org; s=202509s; t=1761863657; bh=MJQmkEaQh7v1yAIPErtv4eEvTHW169SU6VXjY3nFjzI=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:CC:Date:From; b=TWrbi3j8lJrJ6vofnrMB7XcDboz9aOfxoHcgnaRRSgGxJiBCYT2FUERFHNUpG3GiX +D299gur4fj8t8ftUWkufgZCL6Rtp0PnReGYfDpIPo2iaZB5W6FmgDkL8FBwIDSHVP cWAHZIZSerIHk+e+wKY+QA+CNaFcSIg+LdhWvkT0=
Received: by request7.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2FF22C100F28; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 22:34:17 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <iana-issues-comment@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-5.0.3-1034089-1761847168-1559.1435494-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1435494@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-1034089-1761847168-1559.1435494-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-5.0.3-1058886-1761863657-1355.1435494-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1435494
X-Managed-BY: RT 5.0.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 22:34:17 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: 7OTGQ2V2UDHI7HOZKQKD6CWSWSXRGDPM
X-Message-ID-Hash: 7OTGQ2V2UDHI7HOZKQKD6CWSWSXRGDPM
X-MailFrom: iana-shared@iana.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spasm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-lamps-x509-alg-none.all@ietf.org, spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: iana-issues-comment@iana.org
Subject: [lamps] [IANA #1435494] Early review: draft-ietf-lamps-x509-alg-none-10 (IETF 124)
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/dgxPPLtWka8lHv4dQyA81xZ8-Hg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spasm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spasm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spasm-leave@ietf.org>
Dear Authors (cc: lamps WG), Before the IETF meeting, we check working group agendas for documents with IANA-related issues. We have a note about this document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lamps-x509-alg-none-10 In Section 6.3, the document should assign the initial value(s) in Table 4's new “SMI Security for PKIX Relative Distinguished Name Attribute” registry. If you have any questions, just let us know. If you'd like to talk in person, you can find us next to the RFC Editor's table from Monday through Thursday. You can also request another review at any time by contacting us at iana@iana.org. For more information about IANA Considerations section requirements, please see https://www.iana.org/help/protocol-registration Best regards, Amanda Baber IANA
- [lamps] [IANA #1435494] Early review: draft-ietf-… Amanda Baber via RT
- [lamps] Re: [IANA #1435494] Early review: draft-i… Russ Housley