IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lamps] X.510

"Erik Andersen" <era@x500.eu> Sat, 21 September 2019 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <era@x500.eu>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B18912006D for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 06:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PZVe0JihV4zn for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 06:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpscan1.dandomain.dk (smtpscan1.dandomain.dk [194.150.112.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CE64120033 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 06:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpscan1.dandomain.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB062D228A for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 15:34:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtpscan1.dandomain.dk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpscan1.dandomain.dk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xMk9IPjCtN-y for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 15:34:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail02.dandomain.dk (mail02.dandomain.dk [194.150.112.202]) by smtpscan1.dandomain.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8F6D2279 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 15:34:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-proxy.dandomain.dk ([194.150.112.64]) by mail02.dandomain.dk (DanDomain Mailserver) with ASMTP id 2201909211534541628 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 15:34:54 +0200
From: Erik Andersen <era@x500.eu>
To: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 15:34:55 +0200
Message-ID: <000601d57081$5afa8fc0$10efaf40$@x500.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01D57092.1E85D0C0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AdVwgHnXSUKOFJeEQaeWb5AL9ofT4g==
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/vUTFc0flpY0CF63N31use1wysDY>
Subject: [lamps] X.510
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 13:35:03 -0000

Within ITU-T and ISO we have developed a new specification, Rec. ITU-T X.510
| ISO/IEC 9594-11, which now is out for final vote. There is a link to it
here <https://www.dropbox.com/s/qzzuy9hu2vjz9qw/X.510-dis.pdf?dl=0> . We
expect to complete it by March 2020.

 

Any comment any of you might have will be highly appreciated.

 

Best regards,

 

Erik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email