[Speechsc] If anyone cares, biometrics is OK?
Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Fri, 30 August 2013 16:44 UTC
Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: speechsc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: speechsc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660E421E805F for <speechsc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hbmrfOAAOBGs for <speechsc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biz104.inmotionhosting.com (biz104.inmotionhosting.com [74.124.215.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBD221E80A5 for <speechsc@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip68-100-74-194.dc.dc.cox.net ([68.100.74.194]:57736 helo=[192.168.15.107]) by biz104.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1VFRni-0004HZ-4E for speechsc@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:43:58 -0700
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_094BF557-6C09-4BC0-8968-552E4599D7E5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Message-Id: <FE870BC8-8C2D-417C-A1AE-43857D948BBE@standardstrack.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:43:57 -0400
To: speechsc@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz104.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz104.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: eburger+standardstrack.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Subject: [Speechsc] If anyone cares, biometrics is OK?
X-BeenThere: speechsc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Speech Services Control Working Group <speechsc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/speechsc>, <mailto:speechsc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/speechsc>
List-Post: <mailto:speechsc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:speechsc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speechsc>, <mailto:speechsc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:44:09 -0000
http://www.nist.gov/itl/iad/iris-082013.cfm A new report* by biometric researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) uses data from thousands of frequent travelers enrolled in an iris recognition program to determine that no consistent change occurs in the distinguishing texture of their irises for at least a decade. These findings inform identity program administrators on how often iris images need to be recaptured to maintain accuracy. * http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=913900
- [Speechsc] If anyone cares, biometrics is OK? Eric Burger