IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Result of record evaluation with non-implemented mechanism

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Thu, 14 January 2016 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486FD1ACCE9 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:15:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8KepRfT1PzJp for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:15:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2792D1ACCE8 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:15:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=beta; t=1452802532; bh=kJKBoT0g1MJWPIw1FrsV06zURvtQHVkz9xPxbqRm0j8=; l=403; h=To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=xepmRmvMh+IfIV8dTf5Bh6Y404SJmOzzUEZsI0YEHr5UGBQw1HxaP3xMS9jFJj9IQ wirqfdv/XIaHHDtqs5Qc1a87jX5/GVT9MPkkJPG0xbp8uNqpOY/NSysf19+q8JQ7XU gxNVh+3kGNn/TfXKXCtL0CGrspJDvAXZpUi8D2to=
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Received: from [172.25.197.88] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.88]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPA; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:15:32 +0100 id 00000000005DC061.00000000569801E4.0000544B
To: Tim Draegen <tim@eudaemon.net>
References: <5695253F.6060702@tana.it> <F2F738C7-5753-4DF0-B0AA-B1B422DB14C8@eudaemon.net>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Message-ID: <569801E4.3090609@tana.it>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:15:32 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F2F738C7-5753-4DF0-B0AA-B1B422DB14C8@eudaemon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/4ljIvxOj4Fged-i7GZauA9RF1gE>
Cc: spfbis <spfbis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Result of record evaluation with non-implemented mechanism
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spfbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:15:37 -0000

On Thu 14/Jan/2016 17:15:52 +0100 Tim Draegen wrote: 

> I'm OK with removing the exists: mechanism warning shown to users of
> dmarcian's SPF tool.  One thing I'm not sure about is if warning about the
> use of macros should replace it.

Yes, please.  It would clean up the interface a bit.  Would it be possible to
turn it on only after actual SPF permerror's show up in aggregate reports?

Ale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email