Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5436)

Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com> Mon, 12 November 2018 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <scott@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52C01274D0 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:06:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=1TSkBsbA; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=ZtJFFzmd
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CSEfSedFmTbF for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:06:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (mailout03.controlledmail.com [IPv6:2607:f0d0:3001:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA154130E66 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:06:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201803e; t=1542049613; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from : subject : date; bh=OfeAfwy4+6umcqtPu/MslxziOK+nrTLGGa4HUFdAOGk=; b=1TSkBsbAPRRyU3bGXS82Iz3JtToVawSMim4cidNXYJ5Xf0aC6MY9epav oL+NiBNo7WOcWInpHvGklcidRjuxAg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201803r; t=1542049613; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from : subject : date; bh=OfeAfwy4+6umcqtPu/MslxziOK+nrTLGGa4HUFdAOGk=; b=ZtJFFzmdEYmdZFr6f6VnQaplJdC0wWdiuQYvIWzDvhj3CoRWs/zgJ5vH gas7w01Haf1H+gSzd4AuoMkaev3AR39KIumSk47Z1z2WIRlNAziMoo4/YF uvZMiIGX36ZPGuNo9E2YmHScR7BlOAfwJ7YFZm3YPJ+0ROElOs7VcCyMM2 +fRfjrT2bqlOTd/5d0jIWBhK1MbsBPji7MuHbuIbShCy73lq8xgxV8g6Ri mX22IMmtKLgdqCGPc7etCsLkLjJWdEvM+aNb+1/h3+5YN0HgCZac2Jlxj+ o2c5kLRtJIk6HNxJIS20hRnvsrSNd/NkZhkDP0eGCJbYG7l0B9HLuA==
Received: from kitterma-e6430.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78C63C401AD; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:06:53 -0600 (CST)
From: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
To: spfbis@ietf.org
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, sm+ietf@elandsys.com, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com, poccil14@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 14:06:51 -0500
Message-ID: <1976957.bQtEfv25dp@kitterma-e6430>
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-158-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20180723163232.9A308B81350@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20180723163232.9A308B81350@rfc-editor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/YVv1abQPo-V5mJhAywGXGYcjsrI>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5436)
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spfbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 19:06:58 -0000

I think this errata should be accepted.  Sorry for missing it when it came in.

Scott K

On Monday, July 23, 2018 09:32:32 AM RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7208,
> "Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email,
> Version 1".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5436
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com>;
> 
> Section: GLOBAL
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>     header-field     = "Received-SPF:" [CFWS] result FWS [comment FWS]
>                        [ key-value-list ] CRLF
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>     header-field     = "Received-SPF:" [CFWS] result [ FWS comment ]
>                        [ FWS key-value-list ] [FWS] CRLF
> 
> Notes
> -----
> As specified, this ABNF doesn't allow a header field value like
> result-FWS-comment with no FWS or key-value-list following it, a header
> field value which occurs very often in Received-SPF header fields I see in
> practice.  (Note that FWS must contain at least one white space.)  The
> corrected ABNF better follows practice in implementations.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7208 (draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-21)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of
> Domains in Email, Version 1 Publication Date    : April 2014
> Author(s)           : S. Kitterman
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : SPF Update
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spfbis mailing list
> spfbis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis