IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Proof of non-deployment [root@primary.se: Cron <root@primary> /usr/local/libexec/spf-txt.sh]

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Wed, 08 October 2014 04:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F4C1A90DA for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id darLbP844gzN for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp122.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp122.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 845831A90D9 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp8.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F197D8083D; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 00:48:10 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp8.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id 991E1807F9; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 00:48:09 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: ogud@ogud.com
Received: from [10.0.1.52] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [208.72.142.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.2.13); Wed, 08 Oct 2014 04:48:10 GMT
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_26E2CA07-CE8F-4003-B963-48CAA3692A7A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <30D75E02-C7C5-4D6B-8435-B11D822C5262@kitterman.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 00:48:07 -0400
Message-Id: <599A194A-836D-4D61-B7F7-50E9D08D51F9@ogud.com>
References: <20141007063737.GA28581@besserwisser.org> <D6213AB4-ABB2-45C5-AA52-59369B03B88F@anvilwalrusden.com> <CAL0qLwYpA_snEkjnCeXFcxf6kzt-8rF1+Uovypn1yNe+5VVB+w@mail.gmail.com> <20141007164221.GF19697@mx1.yitter.info> <20141007212657.DB75220DE476@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAL0qLwY+VkAG+LN+8-P=mz+NZwACYsh+nnwvZG3if6bHVg0NRQ@mail.gmail.com> <30D75E02-C7C5-4D6B-8435-B11D822C5262@kitterman.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/ckRdLuLLES7vq5fbrgMhTwLBXsA
Cc: "spfbis@ietf.org" <spfbis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Proof of non-deployment [root@primary.se: Cron <root@primary> /usr/local/libexec/spf-txt.sh]
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 04:48:14 -0000

On Oct 7, 2014, at 6:07 PM, Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com> wrote:
>> 
> I'm not particularly interested in spending time relitigating the issue with people throwing ad hominem attacks around. I have my opinion on whose listening skills were deficient.  
> 
> The working group decided and it's done.   Revisiting it now doesn't make any sense. 
> 
> Scott K

+1 

SPF fans (like me) get over it, we lost and its time to move on. 
The only moral is there is a lag between RFC publications and until effects are seen. 

	Olafur

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email