Re: [spring] draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-05
Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Fri, 17 May 2019 06:50 UTC
Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655671200B6 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 23:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EsDzYNFv4FvM for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 23:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CC96120088 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 23:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=896; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1558075805; x=1559285405; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2V83B8pDh1DTzcM1hEneMQDODvkw/i6MQotBBqbkPFs=; b=P7O1qf2dhN7mRGE7DQatHqYWhwsLHdiA1MHYQs3h+q91f6Sd3tXjcTwv 4h2Gl2prZd5Fmv8VuwJxLyFihgXF/yOSK7dKKIAMoKR83pBvjv3pBjcx5 e47uYEfRhkrzu3JRLR1Sj4h1R+fsAsYrUxLVXVT1E8Q5ebJbrjnN4dUuw s=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,478,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="12101941"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 17 May 2019 06:50:03 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.53] (ams-ppsenak-nitro4.cisco.com [10.60.140.53]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4H6o1tN022908; Fri, 17 May 2019 06:50:03 GMT
To: Rajesh M <mrajesh@juniper.net>, "cfilsfil@cisco.com" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, "abashandy.ietf@gmail.com" <abashandy.ietf@gmail.com>, "bruno.decraene@orange.com" <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, "huzhibo@huawei.com" <huzhibo@huawei.com>
References: <BYAPR05MB48212AC3C69F456355822FDDBE0B0@BYAPR05MB4821.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <5100d7bf-d970-f066-1574-a42b9c2510ce@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 08:50:01 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR05MB48212AC3C69F456355822FDDBE0B0@BYAPR05MB4821.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.53, ams-ppsenak-nitro4.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/o7jx0WjSsReCXHLmqXvTThTNO58>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-05
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 06:50:08 -0000
Rajesh, The use case for END.DX and END.DT SIDs advertisement in IGPs is different. The use case for these SIDs is when PLR does not support T.Insert and uses T-Encap to enforce the traffic over the computed backup path. regards, Peter On 17/05/2019 04:58 , Rajesh M wrote: > Hi All, > > > > As per section 8 , END.DT4 can be advertising using ISIS (via END SID > format). > > At SRV6 egress router everything will work fine (Egress router we must > configure which END.DT4 SID for which vrf table). > > > > But at SRV6 ingress router how to decide which END.DT4 SID to use for > which VRF ? > > Again we need to configure IPV6 SID list per VRF @ingress side ? > > > > I think its better to use BGP for END.DT4 signalling > (draft-dawra-bess-srv6-services-00) > > > > > > Thanks > > Rajesh > > > > > > > > > > > Juniper Internal >