[Ssh] Re: IPR Disclosure Daniel J. Bernstein's Statement about IPR related to draft-josefsson-ntruprime-streamlined and draft-josefsson-ntruprime-ssh belonging to Panasonic Corp

"D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to> Thu, 24 October 2024 19:20 UTC

Return-Path: <djb-dsn2-1406711340.7506@cr.yp.to>
X-Original-To: ssh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ssh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88190C14F696 for <ssh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 12:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M13mfC480LPZ for <ssh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 12:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from salsa.cs.uic.edu (salsa.cs.uic.edu [131.193.32.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 39244C14F6A9 for <ssh@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 12:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 14467 invoked by uid 1010); 24 Oct 2024 19:13:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (unknown) by unknown with QMTP; 24 Oct 2024 19:13:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 155819 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Oct 2024 19:13:37 -0000
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:13:37 -0000
Message-ID: <20241024191337.155817.qmail@cr.yp.to>
Mail-Followup-To: ietf-ipr@ietf.org, draft-josefsson-ntruprime-ssh@ietf.org, ipr-announce@ietf.org, ssh@ietf.org
From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
To: ietf-ipr@ietf.org, draft-josefsson-ntruprime-ssh@ietf.org, ipr-announce@ietf.org, ssh@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <172978974074.2605209.750031658967283953@dt-datatracker-78dc5ccf94-w8wgc>
Message-ID-Hash: BEKIMB7OFLBVEQVS5DASO4JKLTVGZ2TQ
X-Message-ID-Hash: BEKIMB7OFLBVEQVS5DASO4JKLTVGZ2TQ
X-MailFrom: djb-dsn2-1406711340.7506@cr.yp.to
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Ssh] Re: IPR Disclosure Daniel J. Bernstein's Statement about IPR related to draft-josefsson-ntruprime-streamlined and draft-josefsson-ntruprime-ssh belonging to Panasonic Corp
List-Id: "The SSH mail list will allow discussions on improving aspects of the Secure Shell (SSH) protocol." <ssh.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ssh/Xz-5ySIzUbkR5wp3UcvL4nlhMFM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ssh>
List-Help: <mailto:ssh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ssh-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ssh@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ssh-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ssh-leave@ietf.org>

This IPR disclosure is a forgery. I didn't file it. The disclosure
claims that I believe that the draft in question is covered by this
patent; I don't. I don't see a problem for any of the deployed versions
of NTRU, such as ntruhrss (deployed by Google) and sntrup (deployed by
OpenSSH et al.); the draft in question uses sntrup.

In the interests of proactively avoiding patent problems, I have public
analyses online of many _potential_ patent threats to cryptography. The
word "potential" is important. The details are important. The results of
the analyses vary from one patent to another. Sometimes there's a real
threat. Sometimes there's clear prior art. Sometimes there isn't clear
prior art but the patent is too limited to be a real problem.

For this particular patent, I already posted an analysis in 2017
(https://cr.yp.to/patents/us/7929688.html) locating prior art directly
on point, so I didn't bother posting my analysis of how limited the
patent is. The patent was also discussed on pqc-forum in 2022:
https://groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov/g/pqc-forum/c/G0DoD7lkGPk/m/Wf872-WqBwAJ

---D. J. Bernstein