[stir] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert-07

Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 02 December 2019 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: stir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC48C1208D3; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 14:59:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, stir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.111.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Message-ID: <157532759781.2265.15893364669205350140@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 14:59:57 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/9g7RZCxfli3-ukPEZ1TxfBDgxKc>
Subject: [stir] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert-07
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 23:00:00 -0000

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the Ops area directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Ops area directors. 
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

The document describes adding attributes to  indicate a call has been diverted
from its original destination to a new one. the document is written very clear.

IMHO, it would be nice not to let any call originator hide his/her information,
so that we can see much smaller number of spam calls.

Best regards,

Linda Dunbar