Re: [stir] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-00.txt

Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Wed, 22 August 2018 01:17 UTC

Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F389130DE6; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.78
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.78 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=standardstrack.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id roSmFrXak2vP; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biz221.inmotionhosting.com (biz221.inmotionhosting.com [23.235.223.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66E0130DD6; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=standardstrack.com; s=default; h=References:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=CEVjE9b/Rx9lx9ukCRcX/5Q8PmHeWAhVq2RVraAq3AQ=; b=mlHE+siJkvlV4N7kC1TqAodRD vEOMpwsoOHdDiQc/05nWETYVa5KJ0rqGjf9e5bi6myAtKT5TQmXaZBlJV3YeY2RPQKRwyRv1PeZeH 761Fc6ym76aq7ciyjnIqizGobvDCgLXb7wk5tKpk47A7EBDfPDINS1a2HFMEQhDkQHysU=;
Received: from [68.100.196.217] (port=58425 helo=[192.168.10.26]) by biz221.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1fsHlZ-00BzwM-Ks; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:17:03 -0700
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
Message-Id: <E0336905-39F3-46B7-8B67-4797E969C8D0@standardstrack.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_184EF0DA-FDF9-4294-8FAF-A8EBC70BFE53"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 21:16:54 -0400
In-Reply-To: <153489089840.9456.7130634417063496277@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: stir@ietf.org
To: sipcore@ietf.org
References: <153489089840.9456.7130634417063496277@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz221.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz221.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: eburger+standardstrack.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Authenticated-Sender: biz221.inmotionhosting.com: eburger@standardstrack.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/YL3DmrYqHq-hleneAGml5Ktmky0>
Subject: Re: [stir] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-00.txt
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 01:17:06 -0000

Of interest to the STIR community, but please keep the discussion on the SIPCORE list.

Updated the Security Considerations section to reflect Tolga’s better articulation of the smurf attack and the vCard integrity / traceability attack. We don’t have a protocol method to address the vCard issue, but I will talk with the card people as there is a draft over there that is 30% of the solution.

Comments welcome.

> On Aug 21, 2018, at 6:34 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Session Initiation Protocol Core WG of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Response Code for Rejected Calls
>        Author          : Eric W. Burger
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-00.txt
> 	Pages           : 15
> 	Date            : 2018-08-21
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document defines the 608 (Rejected) SIP response code.  This
>   response code enables calling parties to learn their call was
>   rejected by an intermediary and will not be answered.  As a 6xx code,
>   the caller will be aware that future attempts to contact the same UAS
>   will be likely to fail.  The present use case driving the need for
>   the 608 response code is when the intermediary is an analytics
>   engine.  In this case, the rejection is by a machine or other
>   process.  This contrasts with the 607 (Unwanted) SIP response code,
>   which a human at the target UAS indicated the call was not wanted.
>   In some jurisdictions this distinction is important and may have
>   additional requirements beyond the 607 response code.  Specifically,
>   this document defines the use of the Call-Info header in 608
>   responses to enable rejected callers to contact entities that blocked
>   their calls in error.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-00
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-00
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore