IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] WG Last Call Comments: draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert-05

"Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@team.neustar> Tue, 16 April 2019 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=30098c1033=jon.peterson@team.neustar>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B097A1200B8 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.338
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.338 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KHOP_DYNAMIC=1.363, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=team.neustar
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HfhWGO0IYCNF for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48CA71200C1 for <stir@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049401.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3GGWlAD021600; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:39:04 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=team.neustar; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=selector1; bh=LgRKW9JizrVm1fHCMcoDEp+AMCkfBGfszAoKWx+ur7U=; b=GUSGRNLBrfBTGYDwCIg5r4dodaSglsrur4sv6Sa7cIcq78n8E6WWTlCe3c4fuahRx3da C5/A6ZqCaxzXkTzTt4FfITPq8Ob2/ZIxfPPwOPN4805FnIYhDC6zkP5XDjCo8VOvKd9O 1IlSbxuQbuthZ5QFVlOEFXlsuUwABZQ+zLIDT6+CPWLPJkwIWzmiknKIW5IZkucb7TKx k1vSlwDfR+kKazx73BH/jlA0c2eYIkrsZMy2PD3vHX33WY4E9zEkA1UoLCBPX1nZ7Zdj ZbVFs5lrhtk/KSh8aNi4QsC3VX/ggvpAlLohjjHzS1vz0JsKKLx7M4HuB6MwsCJnvjQG aA==
Received: from stntexhc11.cis.neustar.com ([156.154.17.216]) by mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ruc39fspx-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:39:04 -0400
Received: from STNTEXMB101.cis.neustar.com ([fe80::a831:d3b4:fb4e:e45b]) by stntexhc11.cis.neustar.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:39:03 -0400
From: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@team.neustar>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
CC: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [stir] WG Last Call Comments: draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert-05
Thread-Index: AQHU85yNh0+cmX1LOUqH/lTch1TgtaY9ZYCAgAB9pYCAAOkiAA==
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:39:03 +0000
Message-ID: <A4512AD5-F52A-4AA2-B7F5-11BFE2AEC6F2@team.neustar>
References: <3162DDF4-CB71-41F8-983B-8572D33B460B@vigilsec.com> <23FC946B-A5BC-4DAC-A281-9DB202C1DC93@team.neustar> <060587D1-11D4-45D0-8605-0B11D38415ED@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <060587D1-11D4-45D0-8605-0B11D38415ED@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.8.190312
x-originating-ip: [10.96.12.236]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <47AF0DDCA258D845AE886FD51320B1D8@neustar.biz>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-16_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=568 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904160109
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/ZRS-msS0jupQXTyBevRqCDpGPss>
Subject: Re: [stir] WG Last Call Comments: draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert-05
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:39:08 -0000

<Russ> My reading of RFC 8225 is that the payload is composed of a collection of claims.  Some of the claims are defined in the JWT specifications, and other are defined specifically for PASSporT.  In the document, it is not clear to me whether a "claim object" is one of the claims in this collection or the whole collection.  If the term payload was used for the whole collection, I think it would be more consistent and clear.</Russ>

I agree that we don't want that ambiguity about whether the "claims object" refers to a single claim or the set of claims. I guess I am a little hesitant to require that we use the JWS term "payload" for this, though, because looking through the RFCs JWT seems to favor the term "claims set". I don't want to get too pedantic about this, but maybe I can remove "claims object" in favor of using either "payload" or "claims set" where their semantics seems to fit?

Jon Peterson
Neustar, Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email