[Suit] Re: Mohamed Boucadair's No Objection on draft-ietf-suit-report-16: (with COMMENT)

[Brendan Moran <[e-mail]>]

Hi Mohamed,

Thanks for re-checking -16 and catching the inconsistency.

> Any reason the code=9/suit-report-severing-unsupported does not have the same pattern as other reasons?

That label now follows the consistent suit-report-reason-* pattern
everywhere in the draft, including the registry tables and CDDL,
matching the other reason codes.

Best Regards,
Brendan Moran

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:26 AM Mohamed Boucadair via Datatracker
<[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Mohamed Boucadair has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-suit-report-16: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-suit-report/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi Brendan and Henk,
>
> Thank you for the changes made in -16 [1]. These address my DISCUSS/COMMENT
> points [2].
>
> One very minor comment, it seems this one didn't make it to the published
> version per [3]:
>
> ----
> >
> > # Consistent patterns for reason code:
> >
> > CURRENT:
> >    *  suit-report-reason-component-unauthorised: The manifest declared a
> >       component that is not accessible by the signer.
> >
> >    *  suit-report-reason-parameter-unsupported: The manifest used a
> >       parameter that does not exist.
> >
> >    *  suit-report-severing-unsupported: The manifest uses severable
> >       fields but the Manifest Processor doesn't support them.
> >
> > Any reason the code=9/suit-report-severing-unsupported does not have the same
> > pattern as other reasons?
>
> Fixed.
> ---------------
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
> [1]
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-suit-report-15&url2=draft-ietf-suit-report-16&difftype=--html
>
> [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/suit/1OO8p0hH5hS_gokAvGCpu64lqmk/
>
> [3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/suit/7b3JyoLek7B8BM6SVWbLiVsk6to/
>
>
>