Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-03.txt

Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Tue, 21 March 2017 08:06 UTC

Return-Path: <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEC8129666 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4wbgq3ahr6ds for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (shonan.sfc.wide.ad.jp [IPv6:2001:200:0:8803::53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2A37129663 for <taps@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-f178.google.com (mail-ot0-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26A4129C6BD for <taps@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:06:12 +0900 (JST)
Received: by mail-ot0-f178.google.com with SMTP id o24so146878088otb.1 for <taps@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H37mCjySNHZnvpsq82AI5ovnNtHovB0EfEeAsDOmqsqobaUYJ7sOhTdbOKtGLkUA3r0AKpSan8IsqNgUg==
X-Received: by 10.157.31.57 with SMTP id x54mr16201712otd.186.1490083570059; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.82.27 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1D4A0D56-6499-488C-9EE5-5CA33980B7E1@ifi.uio.no>
References: <148896186226.26267.9891445617205312227@ietfa.amsl.com> <B12CA59F-7517-4196-A160-DDAA4F566DC6@ifi.uio.no> <1D4A0D56-6499-488C-9EE5-5CA33980B7E1@ifi.uio.no>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:06:09 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAO249yf3dUNhhKXbNm3yDyTQRc-B+AozoOXc7q6p8+jt6jYRoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAO249yf3dUNhhKXbNm3yDyTQRc-B+AozoOXc7q6p8+jt6jYRoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
Cc: "taps@ietf.org" <taps@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d054ae11a35054b391dda"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/nnNVQFQMzn9sq_W76FUEqRLke8Y>
Subject: Re: [Taps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-03.txt
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Transport Services <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:06:16 -0000

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> wrote:

>
> > On Mar 8, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > This is a quite major update: from our (author's) point of view, it now
> (at last!) captures all the RFC-defined API primitives / transport features
> of TCP, MPTCP, SCTP, UDP(-Lite) and LEDBAT.
>
> Sigh, with one exception - I had a plan to include it but when I checked
> again I overlooked section 7.1: TCP-AO (RFC 5925) requires some changes to
> the TCP user interface, not covered in this document. That one will go into
> the next update, together with any other suggestions we’ll receive…
>
> This is just out of my curiosity...
Why there is no mention on DCCP in the draft while we there are some
descriptions of DCCP in RFC8095? I am just curious about the reason for it.
Sorry if this has already been discussed.
--
Yoshi