Re: [tcmtf] [tsvwg] New version (v7) of TCM-TF draft

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Tue, 10 June 2014 08:59 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A311A02BA; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8rlHgYvAKUXT; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx12.netapp.com (mx12.netapp.com [216.240.18.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3406C1A0166; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,1008,1392192000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="169260888"
Received: from vmwexceht06-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.104]) by mx12-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 10 Jun 2014 01:59:27 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.35) by vmwexceht06-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.106.77.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:59:26 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) by hioexcmbx02-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.847.32; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:59:26 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::8485:306a:80a6:ba8f%21]) with mapi id 15.00.0847.030; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:59:26 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] New version (v7) of TCM-TF draft
Thread-Index: Ac+Eh2GI8HW2AgRVTj+g1lvK0tUNGAAPZFUA
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:59:25 +0000
Message-ID: <2066ADBD-A397-4A34-AC40-4413347DB6B3@netapp.com>
References: <014d01cf8487$62adea50$2809bef0$@unizar.es>
In-Reply-To: <014d01cf8487$62adea50$2809bef0$@unizar.es>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.34]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5313AF05-64CC-42B2-B739-9BF96EE40E7D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcmtf/tquHqKg6t-K3gjbBdaUG_rGxpu4
Cc: "tcmtf@ietf.org" <tcmtf@ietf.org>, Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>, "tsv-area@ietf.org" <tsv-area@ietf.org>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] [tsvwg] New version (v7) of TCM-TF draft
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:59:28 -0000

Hi,

are there any measurements or simulations that would quantify the benefits (in terms of bandwidth) and drawbacks (in terms of latency)?

Lars