[tcpm] Suggestion for TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (tcpm)
"tim robertson" <tim987@email.com> Thu, 28 May 2009 05:23 UTC
Return-Path: <tim987@email.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3AC3A6986 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2009 22:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.274
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.274 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.324, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uQ3cM7wTRxzY for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2009 22:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound1-1.us4.outblaze.com (outbound1-1.us4.outblaze.com [208.36.123.129]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454293A68E3 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2009 22:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wfilter3.us4.outblaze.com.int (wfilter3.us4.outblaze.com.int [192.168.8.242]) by outbound1-1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id 7220B7A05AD for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2009 05:25:13 +0000 (GMT)
X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.50) by wfilter3.us4.outblaze.com; 28 May 2009 05:25:13 -0000
Received: by ws1-4.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1B1D0606884; Thu, 28 May 2009 05:25:14 +0000 (GMT)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_124348831437170"
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: tim robertson <tim987@email.com>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 00:25:14 -0500
Importance: high
X-Priority: 1
Received: from [222.152.65.178] by ws1-4.us4.outblaze.com with http for tim987@email.com; Thu, 28 May 2009 00:25:14 -0500
X-Originating-Ip: 222.152.65.178
X-Originating-Server: ws1-4.us4.outblaze.com
X-Ob-Auth: tim987:email.com@mail.com
Message-Id: <20090528052514.1B1D0606884@ws1-4.us4.outblaze.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:01:13 -0700
Subject: [tcpm] Suggestion for TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (tcpm)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 05:23:31 -0000
Hi, I have a suggestion for TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (tcpm). You should make TCP censorship free. By that I mean isp's shouldn't be able to block websites by using blacklists, url blocking, ip address block, dns, keyword block etc. For example, in China, some perfectly legal websites like wikipedia are blocked, so that is why TCP should be changed so isp's cannot block websites. So you may have to work with operating system makers and router makers to update their software, but it should be backwards compatible too. Can you pass on my suggestion?Thanks -- Be Yourself @ mail.com! Choose From 200+ Email Addresses Get a Free Account at www.mail.com
- [tcpm] Suggestion for TCP Maintenance and Minor E… tim robertson
- Re: [tcpm] Suggestion for TCP Maintenance and Min… Joe Touch