Re: [Teas-ns-dt] REMINDER: TEAS NS DT Recurring Thursday Meeting

Hi John,

Thank you for your comment.

What the figure shows are the following points:
- transport slice provides connectivity fulfilling specific SLOs among
endpoints.
- endpoints may be distributed in several networks and transport slice can
be established across multiple networks.

The reason why endpoints seems to be separated is that the endpoints are
distributed in the underlay networks. There are no other intentions.

If you don't like the figure, can you share your image as ascii or ppt
format? Or I can invite you to collaborator to edit xml directly if you
prefer.

Regards,

Shunsuke

On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 1:00 AM John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I don’t think figure 2 is correct because it seems to be making a
> distinction between the endpoints on the left and the endpoints on the
> right, like a switch.  I thought the definition was describing a MP2MP
> construct, i.e., any to any connectivity, with possibly different SLOs
> between specific endpoint pairs.
>
>
>
> Yours Irrespectively,
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> *From:* Teas-ns-dt <teas-ns-dt-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Shunsuke
> Homma
> *Sent:* Friday, February 7, 2020 4:21 AM
> *To:* Jari Arkko <jari.arkko=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Cc:* Kiran Makhijani <kiranm@futurewei.com>; teas-ns-dt@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Teas-ns-dt] REMINDER: TEAS NS DT Recurring Thursday
> Meeting
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I pushed the latest definition draft which was shared from Kiran to NS-DT
> github repo.
>
>
> https://github.com/teas-wg/teas-ns-dt/blob/master/definitions/draft-rokui-teas-transport-slice-definition-00.txt
>
>
>
>
> You can find diffs from the previous version in the following page.
>
>
> https://github.com/teas-wg/teas-ns-dt/commit/e13258a41772e7ee4f4027710db8f8e2a32e5c30
>
>
>
>
> Your further feedback would be appreciated.
>
>
>
> And if you need, I can upload md and xml format files as well.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Shunsuke
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:41 AM Jari Arkko <jari.arkko=
> 40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> *>*We have had some good review discussions on definitions document. If
> you think it’s worth going through the document, we (authors) would like to
> do that in today’s meeting:
>
> >1. to show the recent changes (based on comments)
>
> >2. Feedback on level of detail on a particular topic
>
> >3. more importantly to get feedback if something is missing.
>
>
>
> That sounds great, thank you. Lets do that!
>
>
>
> Jari
>
>
>
> --
> Teas-ns-dt mailing list
> Teas-ns-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-ns-dt
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas-ns-dt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!XABgEwdEmcdgEu-E0Vw-tYjr__NZ5sPU__2MJYqVT9beHpDVvG-aATHCa5udkYg$>
>
>